Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, Basel, Switzerland.
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):12-23. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy091.
In Tanzania, the health financing system is extremely fragmented with strategies in place to supplement funds provided from the central level. One of these strategies is the Community Health Fund (CHF), a voluntary health insurance scheme for the informal rural sector. As its implementation has been challenging, we investigated different CHF implementation practices and how these practices and the wider health financing context affect CHF implementation and potentially enrolment. Two councils were purposively selected for this study. Routine data relevant for understanding CHF implementation in the wider health financing context were collected at council and public health facility level. Additionally, an economic costing approach was used to estimate CHF administration cost and analyse its financing sources. Our results showed the importance of considering different CHF implementation practices and the wider health financing context when looking at CHF performance. Exemption policies and healthcare-seeking behaviour influenced negatively the maximum potential enrolment rate of the voluntary CHF scheme. Higher revenues from user fees, user fee policies and fund pooling mechanisms might have furthermore set incentives for care providers to prioritize user fees over CHF revenues. Costing results clearly pointed out the lack of financial sustainability of the CHF. The financial analysis however also showed that thanks to significant contributions from other health financing mechanisms to CHF administration, the CHF could be left with more than 70% of its revenues for financing services. To make the CHF work, major improvements in CHF implementation practices would be needed, but given the wider health financing context and healthcare-seeking behaviours, it is questionable whether such improvements are feasible, scalable and value for money. Thus, our results call for a reconsideration of approaches taken to address the challenges in health financing and demonstrate that the CHF cannot be looked at as a stand-alone system.
在坦桑尼亚,卫生融资系统极其分散,有策略来补充中央提供的资金。其中一项策略是社区健康基金(CHF),这是一个针对非正式农村部门的自愿健康保险计划。由于其实施具有挑战性,我们调查了不同的 CHF 实施实践,以及这些实践和更广泛的卫生融资环境如何影响 CHF 的实施和潜在的参保率。为这项研究选择了两个委员会。在委员会和公共卫生机构层面收集了与理解更广泛卫生融资环境中的 CHF 实施相关的常规数据。此外,还采用了经济成本核算方法来估计 CHF 管理成本,并分析其资金来源。我们的研究结果表明,在考虑 CHF 绩效时,考虑不同的 CHF 实施实践和更广泛的卫生融资环境非常重要。豁免政策和医疗保健寻求行为对自愿 CHF 计划的最大潜在参保率产生了负面影响。更高的来自用户费用、用户费用政策和资金池机制的收入可能进一步激励了医疗服务提供者优先考虑用户费用而不是 CHF 收入。成本核算结果清楚地表明 CHF 缺乏财务可持续性。然而,财务分析还表明,由于其他卫生融资机制对 CHF 管理的大量贡献,CHF 可能会留下超过其收入的 70%用于为服务提供资金。为了使 CHF 发挥作用,需要对 CHF 的实施实践进行重大改进,但鉴于更广泛的卫生融资环境和医疗保健寻求行为,这种改进是否可行、可扩展且物有所值是值得怀疑的。因此,我们的研究结果呼吁重新考虑解决卫生融资挑战的方法,并表明 CHF 不能被视为一个独立的系统。