van Alem Anouk P, Vrenken Rob H, de Vos Rien, Tijssen Jan G P, Koster Rudolph W
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands.
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1312. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1312.
To test the hypothesis that the use of an automated external defibrillator by police and fire fighters results in higher discharge rates for out of hospital cardiac arrest.
Controlled clinical trial with initial random allocation of automated external defibrillators to first responders in four of the eight participating regions; each region switched from control to experimental, and vice versa, every four months.
Amsterdam and surroundings, the Netherlands.
Patients with witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrests, identified by the emergency medical system between January 2000 and January 2002.
Survival to hospital discharge; return of spontaneous circulation; admission to hospital.
243 patients (65% in ventricular fibrillation) were included in the experimental area and 226 patients (67% in ventricular fibrillation) in the control area. The median time interval between collapse and first shock was 668 seconds in the experimental area and 769 seconds in the control area (P < 0.001). 44 (18%) patients in the experimental area versus 33 (15%) patients in the control area were discharged (odds ratio 1.3 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 2.2), P = 0.33), 139 (57%) experimental versus 108 (48%) control patients had return of spontaneous circulation (1.5 (1.0 to 2.2), P = 0.05), and 103 (42%) experimental versus 74 (33%) control patients were admitted (1.5 (1.1 to 1.6), P = 0.02). The median delay from receipt of call to dispatch of the ambulance was 120 seconds, and the delay to dispatch of the first responder was 180 seconds.
Use of automated external defibrillators by first responders did not significantly increase survival to discharge from hospital, although it did improve return of spontaneous circulation and admission to hospital. Improved dispatch procedures should increase the success of programmes of first responders using external defibrillators.
检验警察和消防员使用自动体外除颤器可提高院外心脏骤停患者除颤率这一假设。
对照临床试验,最初将自动体外除颤器随机分配给八个参与地区中的四个地区的急救人员;每个地区每四个月从对照组切换到试验组,反之亦然。
荷兰阿姆斯特丹及其周边地区。
2000年1月至2002年1月期间由紧急医疗系统确认的院外心脏骤停目击者。
出院存活率;自主循环恢复情况;入院情况。
试验组纳入243例患者(65%为室颤),对照组纳入226例患者(67%为室颤)。试验组从心脏骤停至首次除颤的中位时间间隔为668秒,对照组为769秒(P<0.001)。试验组44例(18%)患者出院,对照组33例(15%)患者出院(比值比1.3(95%置信区间0.8至2.2),P = 0.33);试验组139例(57%)患者恢复自主循环,对照组108例(48%)患者恢复自主循环(1.5(1.0至2.2),P = 0.05);试验组103例(42%)患者入院,对照组74例(33%)患者入院(1.5(1.1至1.6),P = 0.02)。接到呼叫至救护车派遣的中位延迟时间为120秒,急救人员派遣延迟时间为180秒。
急救人员使用自动体外除颤器虽能改善自主循环恢复情况和入院情况,但并未显著提高出院存活率。改进派遣程序应能提高急救人员使用体外除颤器项目的成功率。