Taylor James A, Weber Wendy, Standish Leanna, Quinn Hal, Goesling Jenna, McGann Mary, Calabrese Carlo
Child Health Institute, University of Washington and Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Wash 98915-4920, USA.
JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2824-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2824.
Echinacea is a widely used herbal remedy for treatment of upper respiratory tract infections (URIs). However, there are few data on the efficacy and safety of echinacea in treating URIs in children.
To determine if Echinacea purpurea is effective in reducing the duration and/or severity of URI symptoms in children and to assess its safety in this population.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of healthy children 2 to 11 years old recruited from a regional practice-based network and an alternative medical center in 4-month periods from 2000 through 2002.
Study patients were randomized to receive either echinacea or placebo for up to 3 URIs over a 4-month period. Study medication was begun at the onset of symptoms and continued throughout the URI, for a maximum of 10 days.
Primary outcomes were duration and severity of symptoms and adverse events recorded by parents; secondary outcomes included peak severity of symptoms, number of days of peak severity, number of days of fever, and a global assessment of severity of symptoms by parents of study children.
Data were analyzed on 707 URIs that occurred in 407 children, including 337 URIs treated with echinacea and 370 with placebo. There were 79 children who completed their study period without having a URI. The median duration of URIs was 9 days (95% confidence interval, 8-10 days); there was no difference in duration between URIs treated with echinacea or placebo (P =.89). There was also no difference in the overall estimate of severity of URI symptoms between the 2 treatment groups (median, 33 in both groups; P =.69). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for peak severity of symptoms (P =.68), number of days of peak symptoms (1.60 in the echinacea group and 1.64 in the placebo group; P =.97), number of days of fever (0.81 in the echinacea group vs 0.64 in the placebo group; P =.09), or parental global assessment of severity of the URI (P =.67). Overall, there was no difference in the rate of adverse events reported in the 2 treatment groups; however, rash occurred during 7.1% of the URIs treated with echinacea and 2.7% of those treated with placebo (P =.008).
Echinacea purpurea, as dosed in this study, was not effective in treating URI symptoms in patients 2 to 11 years old, and its use was associated with an increased risk of rash.
紫锥菊是一种广泛用于治疗上呼吸道感染(URI)的草药疗法。然而,关于紫锥菊治疗儿童URI的疗效和安全性的数据很少。
确定紫锥菊是否能有效缩短儿童URI症状的持续时间和/或减轻其严重程度,并评估其在该人群中的安全性。
设计、设置和参与者:对2000年至2002年期间从一个基于区域实践的网络和一个替代医学中心招募的2至11岁健康儿童进行随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,为期4个月。
研究患者被随机分配在4个月内接受紫锥菊或安慰剂治疗,最多治疗3次URI。研究药物在症状出现时开始使用,并在整个URI期间持续使用,最长使用10天。
主要观察指标是父母记录的症状持续时间和严重程度以及不良事件;次要观察指标包括症状的峰值严重程度、峰值严重程度的天数、发热天数以及研究儿童父母对症状严重程度的整体评估。
对407名儿童发生的707次URI进行了数据分析,其中337次URI用紫锥菊治疗,370次用安慰剂治疗。有79名儿童在完成研究期间未发生URI。URI的中位持续时间为9天(95%置信区间,8 - 10天);紫锥菊治疗的URI和安慰剂治疗的URI在持续时间上没有差异(P = 0.89)。两个治疗组在URI症状严重程度的总体评估上也没有差异(中位数,两组均为33;P = 0.69)。此外,两组在症状的峰值严重程度(P = 0.68)、峰值症状天数(紫锥菊组为1.60天,安慰剂组为1.64天;P = 0.97)、发热天数(紫锥菊组为0.81天,安慰剂组为0.64天;P = 0.09)或父母对URI严重程度的整体评估(P = 0.67)方面均无统计学显著差异。总体而言,两个治疗组报告的不良事件发生率没有差异;然而,紫锥菊治疗的URI中有7.1%出现皮疹,安慰剂治疗的URI中有2.7%出现皮疹(P = 0.008)。
本研究中所使用剂量的紫锥菊对治疗2至11岁患者的URI症状无效,且其使用与皮疹风险增加有关。