Liu Yi-Chang, Chang Chao-Sung, Liu Ta-Chih, Chen Tyen-Po, Sue Yu-Chieh, Hsiao Hui-Hua, Lin Sheng-Fung
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003 Nov;19(11):541-8. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70504-2.
This retrospective study compared the outcomes in 32 adult patients with hematologic diseases (acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, severe aplastic anemia) who received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT, n = 14; median age, 28 years) or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT, n = 18; median age, 29 years) from human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donors. Median follow-up was 58 months in BMT recipients and 18 months in PBSCT recipients. Neutrophil (median, Day 8 vs Day 13, p < 0.001) and platelet engraftment (median, Day 9 vs Day 17, p < 0.001) was faster in the PBSCT group than in the BMT group. Patients receiving PBSCT required less platelet transfusion than those receiving BMT (median, 54 units vs 144 units, p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in red cell transfusion. At 100 days, there was no difference in the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (42.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.72) or grade II-IV acute GVHD (14.3% vs 5.6%, p = 0.57), and there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (20% vs 33.3%, p = 0.67). No chronic GVHD was noted in any relapsed patients (BMT, 5; PBSCT, 3), and no patients with chronic GVHD during follow-up had a relapse. Relapse was the most frequent cause of death inboth groups (BMT, 5/9, 55.6%; PBSCT, 3/4, 75%; p = 0.25); all relapses occurred within 1 year after transplantation. Overall survival was significantly better in the PBSCT group (35.7% vs 77.8%, p = 0.029), but this difference was lost if only hematologic malignancies were analyzed (30.8% vs 63.6%, p = 0.20). Our results are similar to those reported previously, with faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment and less severe acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD with PBSCT. Allogeneic PBSCT is a feasible and beneficial alternative to allogeneic BMT in adult hematologic disease.
这项回顾性研究比较了32例成年血液病患者(急性髓系白血病、急性淋巴细胞白血病、慢性髓系白血病、骨髓增生异常综合征、重型再生障碍性贫血)的治疗结果,这些患者接受了来自人类白细胞抗原匹配的同胞供者的异基因骨髓移植(BMT,n = 14;中位年龄28岁)或异基因外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT,n = 18;中位年龄29岁)。BMT受者的中位随访时间为58个月,PBSCT受者为18个月。PBSCT组的中性粒细胞植入(中位时间,第8天对第13天,p < 0.001)和血小板植入(中位时间,第9天对第17天,p < 0.001)比BMT组更快。接受PBSCT的患者比接受BMT的患者需要更少的血小板输注(中位值,54单位对144单位,p < 0.001),但红细胞输注方面无显著差异。在100天时,急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的发生率(42.9%对33.3%,p = 0.72)或II-IV级急性GVHD的发生率(14.3%对5.6%,p = 0.57)无差异,慢性GVHD的累积发生率也无差异(20%对33.3%,p = 0.67)。在任何复发患者(BMT组5例,PBSCT组3例)中均未发现慢性GVHD,且随访期间有慢性GVHD的患者均未复发。复发是两组中最常见的死亡原因(BMT组5/9,55.6%;PBSCT组3/4,75%;p = 0.25);所有复发均发生在移植后1年内。PBSCT组的总生存率显著更高(35.7%对77.8%,p = 0.029),但仅分析血液系统恶性肿瘤时,这种差异消失(30.8%对63.6%,p = 0.20)。我们的结果与先前报道的相似,PBSCT的中性粒细胞和血小板植入更快,急性GVHD较轻,慢性GVHD范围较广。在成人血液病中,异基因PBSCT是异基因BMT的一种可行且有益的替代方法。