Suppr超能文献

异基因造血干细胞和骨髓移植治疗急性髓系白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征:干细胞来源对疗效的影响。

Allogeneic blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplasia: influence of stem cell source on outcome.

作者信息

Russell J A, Larratt L, Brown C, Turner A R, Chaudhry A, Booth K, Woodman R C, Wolff J, Valentine K, Stewart D, Ruether J D, Ruether B A, Klassen J, Jones A R, Gyonyor E, Egeler M, Dunsmore J, Desai S, Coppes M J, Bowen T, Anderson R, Poon M C

机构信息

Alberta Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Foothills Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Dec;24(11):1177-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702051.

Abstract

We have compared the outcomes of 87 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) receiving matched sibling transplants with stem cells from peripheral blood (blood cell transplant, BCT) or bone marrow (BMT). In good risk patients (AML in CR1) granulocytes recovered to 0.5 x 10(9)/l a median of 14 days after BCT compared with 19 days after BMT (P < 0.0001). For patients with poor risk disease (AML beyond CR1 and MDS) corresponding figures were 16 vs 26 days (P < 0.0001). Platelet recovery to 20 x 10(9)/l was also faster after BCT (good risk 12 vs 20 days, P < 0.0001; poor risk 17 vs 22 days, P = 0.04). Red cell transfusions were unaffected by cell source, but BCT recipients required less platelet transfusions (good risk 1 vs 5, P = 0.002; poor risk 5 vs 11, P = 0.004). Blood cell transplants resulted in more chronic GVHD (86% vs 48%, P = 0.005) and a significantly higher proportion of recipients with KPS of 80% or less (48% vs 5%, P = 0.004). Disease-free survival at 4 years was 23% for both groups of poor risk patients but outcome in good risk patients was better after BCT (93% vs 62%, P = 0.047) related mainly to less relapse. While disease-free survival may be better after BCT than BMT for AML in CR1, quality of life may be relatively impaired.

摘要

我们比较了87例急性髓性白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者接受外周血干细胞同胞匹配移植(血细胞移植,BCT)或骨髓移植(BMT)的结果。在低危患者(CR1期的AML)中,BCT后粒细胞恢复至0.5×10⁹/L的中位时间为14天,而BMT后为19天(P<0.0001)。对于高危疾病患者(CR1期以后的AML和MDS),相应数字分别为16天和26天(P<0.0001)。BCT后血小板恢复至20×10⁹/L也更快(低危患者12天对20天,P<0.0001;高危患者17天对22天,P=0.04)。红细胞输血不受细胞来源影响,但BCT受者需要的血小板输血较少(低危患者1次对5次,P=0.002;高危患者5次对11次,P=0.004)。血细胞移植导致更多慢性移植物抗宿主病(86%对48%,P=0.005),且KPS为80%或更低的受者比例显著更高(48%对5%,P=0.004)。两组高危患者4年无病生存率均为23%,但低危患者BCT后的结局更好(93%对62%,P=0.047),主要与复发较少有关。虽然对于CR1期的AML,BCT后的无病生存率可能优于BMT,但生活质量可能会相对受损。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验