• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

22G惠特克针和22G昆克针的听觉影响。

Influence of hearing of 22 G Whitacre and 22 G Quincke needles.

作者信息

Sundberg A, Wang L P, Fog J

机构信息

Anaesthetic Department, Eksjö-Nässjö Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1992 Nov;47(11):981-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03205.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03205.x
PMID:1466443
Abstract

Audiograms were performed pre-operatively and 2 days postoperatively in 48 patients given spinal anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. Hearing levels were examined at 1000 Hz and below. Either 22 G standard design (Quincke) needles (n = 25) or 22 G pencil-point design (Whitacre) needles (n = 23) were used. Hearing loss of 10 dB or more at two or more frequencies were observed in six of 25 patients in the Quincke group and in two of 23 patients in the Whitacre group. The mean hearing level was more reduced in the Quincke group. The shape of the tip of the spinal needle seems to be of some importance to the effects on hearing level that may occur after spinal anaesthesia.

摘要

对48例接受脊髓麻醉以行经尿道前列腺切除术的患者在术前及术后2天进行了听力图检查。在1000赫兹及以下频率检查听力水平。使用了22G标准设计(昆克式)针(n = 25)或22G铅笔尖设计(惠特克式)针(n = 23)。在昆克式针组的25例患者中有6例以及在惠特克式针组的23例患者中有2例在两个或更多频率出现了10分贝或更高的听力损失。昆克式针组的平均听力水平下降得更多。脊髓穿刺针尖端的形状似乎对脊髓麻醉后可能出现的听力水平影响具有一定重要性。

相似文献

1
Influence of hearing of 22 G Whitacre and 22 G Quincke needles.22G惠特克针和22G昆克针的听觉影响。
Anaesthesia. 1992 Nov;47(11):981-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03205.x.
2
Post dural puncture headache after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a comparison of 25 g Quincke, 27 g Quincke and 27 g Whitacre spinal needles.剖宫产脊髓麻醉后硬膜穿刺头痛:25G Quincke针、27G Quincke针和27G Whitacre脊髓针的比较
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):10-3.
3
[Electron microscopy of the lesions produced in the human dura mater by Quincke beveled and Whitacre needles].[对由昆克斜面针和惠塔克针在人硬脑膜上造成的损伤进行的电子显微镜检查]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1997 Feb;44(2):56-61.
4
The use of Quincke and Whitacre 27-gauge needles in orthopedic patients: incidence of failed spinal anesthesia and postdural puncture headache.在骨科患者中使用昆克(Quincke)和惠塔克(Whitacre)27号针头:脊髓麻醉失败和硬膜穿刺后头痛的发生率。
Anesth Analg. 1994 Jul;79(1):124-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199407000-00023.
5
Whitacre or Quincke needles--does it really matter.惠特克针还是昆克针——这真的重要吗?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1998;113:17-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb04981.x.
6
A microscopic analysis of cut-bevel versus pencil-point spinal needles.切割斜面与铅笔尖型脊髓穿刺针的微观分析
Anesth Analg. 1997 Nov;85(5):1101-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199711000-00025.
7
Comparison of 27-gauge (0.41-mm) Whitacre and Quincke spinal needles with respect to post-dural puncture headache and non-dural puncture headache.27号(0.41毫米)惠特克(Whitacre)和奎克(Quincke)脊髓穿刺针在硬膜穿刺后头痛和非硬膜穿刺头痛方面的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Apr;48(4):474-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00345.x.
8
Rates of Epidural Blood Patch following Lumbar Puncture Comparing Atraumatic versus Bevel-Tip Needles Stratified for Body Mass Index.比较 BMI 分层的非创伤性与斜面针尖腰椎穿刺后硬膜外血补丁的发生率。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Feb;43(2):315-318. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7397. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
[The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache].[针型与制动对脊柱穿刺后头痛的影响]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Oct;46(10):860-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050480.
10
Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of 22-gauge and 25-gauge Whitacre needles with 26-gauge Quincke needles.剖宫产脊髓麻醉:22号和25号Whitacre针与26号Quincke针的比较
Br J Anaesth. 1992 Dec;69(6):589-94. doi: 10.1093/bja/69.6.589.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia with otoacoustic emissions.用耳声发射评估脊髓麻醉后的听力损失。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Aug;263(8):705-10. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0049-3. Epub 2006 May 6.