Suppr超能文献

[针型与制动对脊柱穿刺后头痛的影响]

[The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache].

作者信息

Hafer J, Rupp D, Wollbrück M, Engel J, Hempelmann G

机构信息

Abteilung Anaesthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1997 Oct;46(10):860-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050480.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a significant complication of spinal anaesthesia. Diameter and tip of the needle as well as the patient's age have been proven to be important determinants. The question of whether post-operative recumbency can reduce the risk of PDPH has not been answered uniformly. And besides, some studies referring to this subject reveal methodical failures, for example, as to clear definition and exact documentation of post-operative immobilization. Furthermore, fine-gauge needles (26G or more) have not been investigated yet. The first aim of our study was therefore to examine the role of recumbency in the prevention of PDPH under controlled conditions using thin needles. Secondly, we wanted to confirm the reported prophylactic effect of needles with a modified, atraumatic tip (Whitacre and Atraucan) by comparing them to Quincke needles of identical diameter. Most of the former investigators compared Quincke with atraumatic needles of different size regardless of the known influence of the diameter on PDPH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study we included 481 consecutive patients undergoing a total of 500 orthopaedic operations under spinal anaesthesia. The latter was performed in a standardized manner (patient sitting, midline approach, needle with parallel bevel direction), using four different needles allocated randomly (26-gauge and 27-gauge needles with Quincke tip, 26-gauge Atraucan and 27-gauge Whitacre cannula). Half of the patients were instructed to stay in bed for 24 h (horizontal position without raising head), the others to get up as early as possible. An anaesthesiologist visited the patients on the fourth postoperative day or later and questioned them about headache and duration of recumbency. Additionally, the patients had to fill out a questionnaire 1 week after surgery. Any postural headache was considered as PDPH.

RESULTS

The four groups of different needles had homogeneous demographic characteristics (see Table 1). A total of 47 patients (9.4%) developed PDPH. The incidence was highest after puncture with a 26-gauge Quincke cannula (17.6%) with a significant difference compared to the other needles (see Table 2). PDPH incidence correlated well with increasing age and number of dural punctures, but showed no relation to sex, patient's history of headache or experience of the anaesthesiologist. Only about half of the patients (60.5%) followed the instructions regarding mobilization or recumbency. The duration of strict bed rest did not influence the development of PDPH: The overall incidence was 9.4% in the recumbency group and 8.8% in the group of early ambulation. In all, 45 patients suffered from ordinary not posture-related headache.

CONCLUSIONS

The significantly higher incidence of PDPH after spinal anaesthesia with 26-gauge Quincke needles compared to the 27-gauge Quincke and the 26-gauge Atraucan group confirmed the importance of both needle diameter and design of its tip. The Atraucan cannula has not been examined in a controlled study (in comparison with Quincke needle of the same diameter) before. In accordance with other investigators we found patient's age and number of puncture attempts as additional predictors of PDPH. Consequent bed rest, however, was not able to reduce its incidence. Our studies reveal the poor compliance of patients with regard to mobilization/immobilization, a problem which possibly has not been considered enough in former studies examining the influence of bed rest on PDPH. Based on the literature and the present findings, we recommend using thin needles with atraumatic tips for spinal anaesthesia if possible. Recumbency presents an avoidable stress for patients as well as medical staff and should no longer be ordered.

摘要

未标注

腰穿后头痛(PDPH)是脊髓麻醉的一种重要并发症。已证实针的直径、针尖以及患者年龄是重要的决定因素。术后卧位能否降低PDPH风险的问题尚未得到一致解答。此外,一些涉及该主题的研究存在方法学缺陷,例如术后制动的明确定义及准确记录方面。而且,细针(26G及以上)尚未得到研究。因此,我们研究的首要目的是在可控条件下使用细针检查卧位在预防PDPH中的作用。其次,我们想通过将改良的无创伤针尖针(Whitacre和Atraucan)与相同直径的Quincke针进行比较,来证实所报道的其预防效果。以前的大多数研究者在比较Quincke针与不同尺寸的无创伤针时,未考虑直径对PDPH的已知影响。

患者与方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了481例连续接受脊髓麻醉下共500例骨科手术的患者。脊髓麻醉以标准化方式进行(患者坐位、中线入路、针斜面方向平行),随机分配使用四种不同的针(26G和27G的Quincke针尖针、26G的Atraucan针和27G的Whitacre套管针)。一半患者被要求卧床24小时(水平卧位,不抬头),另一半患者尽早起床。一名麻醉医生在术后第四天或更晚时间访视患者,询问他们关于头痛及卧位持续时间的情况。此外,患者在术后1周需填写一份问卷。任何姿势性头痛均被视为PDPH。

结果

四组不同的针具有相似的人口统计学特征(见表1)。共有47例患者(9.4%)发生PDPH。使用26G Quincke套管针穿刺后发生率最高(17.6%),与其他针相比有显著差异(见表2)。PDPH发生率与年龄增长和硬膜穿刺次数密切相关,但与性别、患者头痛史或麻醉医生经验无关。只有约一半的患者(60.5%)遵循了关于活动或卧位的指示。严格卧床休息的持续时间并未影响PDPH的发生:卧位组的总体发生率为9.4%,早期活动组为8.8%。共有45例患者患有普通的非姿势性头痛。

结论

与27G Quincke针和26G Atraucan组相比,使用26G Quincke针进行脊髓麻醉后PDPH的发生率显著更高,这证实了结直径和针尖设计的重要性。此前尚未在对照研究中对Atraucan套管针(与相同直径的Quincke针比较)进行过检查。与其他研究者一致,我们发现患者年龄和穿刺尝试次数是PDPH的额外预测因素。然而,持续卧床并不能降低其发生率。我们的研究揭示了患者在活动/制动方面的依从性较差,这一问题在以前研究卧床休息对PDPH影响时可能未得到充分考虑。基于文献和目前的研究结果,我们建议尽可能使用带有无创伤针尖的细针进行脊髓麻醉。卧位对患者和医护人员来说是一种可避免的压力,不应再要求执行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验