Schinke Steven P, Di Noia Jennifer, Glassman Jill R
Columbia University School of Social Work, 622 West 113th Street, New York, NY 10025, USA.
Addict Behav. 2004 Jan;29(1):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.07.002.
This research evaluated a computer-mediated intervention for preventing drug abuse and violence. Research participants were economically disadvantaged youth, defined as early adolescents from households with family incomes below the Federal poverty line. Based on cognitive-behavioral skills approaches shown effective in past research, computer intervention was compared with conventionally delivered intervention in a pretest-posttest, control group design. Outcome findings revealed that youth assigned to the computer or conventional intervention arms achieved more positive pretest-to-posttest gain scores than youth in the control arm on several variables. These variables were: how youth regarded people who used drugs, strategies for avoiding trouble, and ways for controlling their tempers. One item, the ability to refuse drug offers, favored youth in the conventional intervention arm over those in the computer or control arms. Combined with prior work on computer-delivered interventions, data from this study lend added support to the viability of computer approaches for preventing drug abuse, violence, and other problem behavior among early adolescent youth.
本研究评估了一种通过计算机介导的预防药物滥用和暴力行为的干预措施。研究参与者为经济条件不利的青少年,定义为来自家庭收入低于联邦贫困线家庭的早熟青少年。基于过去研究中显示有效的认知行为技能方法,在一项前测-后测、对照组设计中,将计算机干预与传统方式实施的干预进行了比较。结果发现,在几个变量上,被分配到计算机干预组或传统干预组的青少年比对照组的青少年在前测到后测中获得了更积极的得分增长。这些变量包括:青少年如何看待吸毒者、避免麻烦的策略以及控制情绪的方法。在一项指标(拒绝毒品提议的能力)上,传统干预组的青少年比计算机干预组或对照组的青少年表现更好。结合此前关于计算机辅助干预的研究,本研究数据进一步支持了计算机方法在预防早熟青少年药物滥用、暴力及其他问题行为方面的可行性。