Fischer Lucy Rose, Green Carla A, Goodman Michael J, Brody Kathleen K, Aickin Mikel, Wei Feifei, Phelps Linda W, Leutz Walter
HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1407-16. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100587.51573.7A.
To test the substitution hypothesis, that community-based care reduces the probability of institutional placement for at-risk elderly.
The closure of the Social Health Maintenance Organization (Social HMO) at HealthPartners (HP) in Minnesota in 1994 and the continuation of the Social HMO at Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) in Oregon/Washington comprised a "natural experiment." Using multinomial logistic regression analyses, we followed cohorts of Social HMO enrollees for up to 5 years, 1995 to 1999. To adjust for site effects and secular trends, we also followed age- and gender-matched Medicare-Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) cohorts, enrolled in the same HMOs but not in the Social HMOs.
All enrollees in the Social HMO for at least 4 months in 1993 and an age-gender matched sample of Medicare-TEFRA enrollees. To be included, individuals had to be alive and have a period out of an institution after January 1, 1995 (total n = 18,143).
The primary data sources were the electronic databases at HP and KPNW. The main outcomes were long-term nursing home placement (90+ days) or mortality. Covariates were age, gender, a comorbidity index, and geographic site effect.
Adjusting for variations in the 2 sites, we found no difference in probability of mortality between the 2 cohorts, but approximately a 40% increase in long-term institutional placement associated with the termination of the Social HMO at HealthPartners (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.79).
The Social HMO appears to help at-risk elderly postpone long-term nursing home placement.
检验替代假说,即基于社区的照护可降低高危老年人进入机构安置的可能性。
1994年明尼苏达州健康伙伴(HP)的社会健康维护组织(Social HMO)关闭,而俄勒冈州/华盛顿州凯撒永久医疗集团西北分部(KPNW)的Social HMO继续运营,这构成了一项“自然实验”。我们使用多项逻辑回归分析,对1995年至1999年长达5年的Social HMO参保人群进行追踪。为调整地点效应和长期趋势,我们还追踪了年龄和性别匹配的《医疗保险税收公平与财政责任法案》(TEFRA)参保人群,他们参保于相同的健康维护组织,但未参加Social HMO。
1993年至少参保Social HMO 4个月的所有参保者,以及年龄和性别匹配的Medicare-TEFRA参保者样本。要纳入研究,个体必须存活且在1995年1月1日后有一段不在机构中的时期(总计n = 18,143)。
主要数据来源是HP和KPNW的电子数据库。主要结局是长期入住养老院(90天以上)或死亡。协变量包括年龄、性别、合并症指数和地理位置效应。
调整两个地点的差异后,我们发现两组人群的死亡概率没有差异,但与HealthPartners的Social HMO终止相关的长期机构安置概率大约增加了40%(优势比,1.43;95%置信区间,1.15 - 1.79)。
Social HMO似乎有助于高危老年人推迟长期入住养老院。