Suppr超能文献

正式照护与非正式照护之间的相互关系:法国和以色列的一项研究。

The inter-relationship between formal and informal care: a study in France and Israel.

作者信息

Litwin Howard, Attias-Donfut Claudine

机构信息

Israel Gerontological Data Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Ageing Soc. 2009 Jan;29(1):71-91. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X08007666.

Abstract

This study examined whether formal care services delivered to frail older people's homes in France and Israel substitute for or complement informal support. The two countries have comparable family welfare systems but many historical, cultural and religious differences. Data for the respondents aged 75 or more years at the first wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) were analysed. Regressions were examined of three patterns of care from outside the household: informal support only, formal support only and both formal and informal care, with the predictor variables including whether informal help was provided by a family member living in the household. The results revealed that about one-half of the respondents received no help at all (France 51%, Israel 55%), about one-tenth received care from a household member (France 8%, Israel 10%), and one-third were helped by informal carers from outside the household (France 34%, Israel 33%). More French respondents (35%) received formal care services at home than Israelis (27%). Most predictors of the care patterns were similar in the two countries. The analysis showed that complementarity is a common outcome of the co-existence of formal and informal care, and that mixed provision occurs more frequently in situations of greater need. It is also shown that spouse care-givers had less formal home-care supports than either co-resident children or other family care-givers. Even so, spouses, children and other family care-givers all had considerable support from formal home-delivered care.

摘要

本研究调查了法国和以色列向体弱老年人家庭提供的正规护理服务是替代还是补充了非正规支持。这两个国家有着类似的家庭福利体系,但在历史、文化和宗教方面存在诸多差异。对欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)首轮调查中年龄在75岁及以上的受访者数据进行了分析。研究了来自家庭外部的三种护理模式的回归情况:仅非正规支持、仅正规支持以及正规和非正规护理都有,预测变量包括是否由居住在家庭中的家庭成员提供非正规帮助。结果显示,约一半的受访者完全没有得到帮助(法国为51%,以色列为55%),约十分之一的受访者得到了家庭成员的护理(法国为8%,以色列为10%),三分之一的受访者得到了家庭外部非正规护理人员的帮助(法国为34%,以色列为33%)。在家中接受正规护理服务的法国受访者(35%)比以色列受访者(27%)更多。两国护理模式的大多数预测因素相似。分析表明,互补性是正规和非正规护理并存的常见结果,而且在需求更大的情况下,混合提供护理的情况更频繁出现。研究还表明,配偶护理人员得到的家庭正规护理支持比同住子女或其他家庭护理人员少。即便如此,配偶、子女和其他家庭护理人员都从家庭提供的正规护理中获得了相当多的支持。

相似文献

5
Frailty differences in older adults' use of informal and formal care.老年人对非正式和正式护理的使用存在脆弱性差异。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Nov-Dec;79:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers.欧洲代际间资金与时间转移模式。
Eur J Ageing. 2005 Oct 18;2(3):161-173. doi: 10.1007/s10433-005-0008-7. eCollection 2005 Sep.
6
Community-based care and risk of nursing home placement.基于社区的护理与入住养老院的风险。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1407-16. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100587.51573.7A.
7
The shifting balance of long-term care in Sweden.瑞典长期护理的动态平衡
Gerontologist. 2002 Jun;42(3):350-5. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.3.350.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验