Ickovics Jeannette R, Kershaw Trace S, Westdahl Claire, Rising Sharon Schindler, Klima Carrie, Reynolds Heather, Magriples Urania
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):1051-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00765-8.
To examine the impact of group versus individual prenatal care on birth weight and gestational age.
This prospective, matched cohort study included pregnant women (N = 458) entering prenatal care at 24 or less weeks' gestation; one half received group prenatal care with women of the same gestational age. Women were matched by clinic, age, race, parity, and infant birth date. Women were predominantly black and Hispanic of low socioeconomic status, served by one of three public clinics in Atlanta, Georgia or New Haven, Connecticut.
Birth weight was greater for infants of women in group versus individual prenatal care (P < .01). Among those born preterm, infants of group patients were significantly larger than infants of individual-care patients (mean, 2398 versus 1990 g, P < .05). Although not statistically significant, infants of group patients were less likely than those of individual-care patients to be low birth weight (less than 2500 g; 16 versus 23 infants); very low birth weight (less than 1500 g; three versus six infants); early preterm (less than 33 weeks; two versus seven infants); or to experience neonatal loss (none versus three infants). There were no differences in number of prenatal visits or other risk characteristics (patient age, race, prior preterm birth).
Group prenatal care results in higher birth weight, especially for infants delivered preterm. Group prenatal care provides a structural innovation, permitting more time for provider-patient interaction and therefore the opportunity to address clinical as well as psychological, social, and behavioral factors to promote healthy pregnancy. Results have implications for design of sustainable prenatal services that might contribute to reduction of racial disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes.
探讨小组产前护理与个体产前护理对出生体重和孕周的影响。
这项前瞻性、匹配队列研究纳入了妊娠24周及以内开始接受产前护理的孕妇(N = 458);其中一半与孕周相同的女性一起接受小组产前护理。根据诊所、年龄、种族、产次和婴儿出生日期对女性进行匹配。这些女性主要是社会经济地位较低的黑人和西班牙裔,由佐治亚州亚特兰大或康涅狄格州纽黑文的三家公立诊所之一提供服务。
接受小组产前护理的女性所生婴儿的出生体重高于接受个体产前护理的女性(P <.01)。在早产婴儿中,小组护理患者的婴儿明显大于个体护理患者的婴儿(平均体重分别为2398克和1990克,P <.05)。虽然无统计学意义,但小组护理患者的婴儿比个体护理患者的婴儿出生体重低(低于2500克)的可能性更小(分别为16例和23例婴儿);极低出生体重(低于1500克)的可能性更小(分别为3例和6例婴儿);早期早产(低于33周)的可能性更小(分别为2例和7例婴儿);或发生新生儿死亡的可能性更小(分别为0例和3例婴儿)。产前检查次数或其他风险特征(患者年龄、种族、既往早产史)无差异。
小组产前护理可使出生体重增加,尤其是对于早产婴儿。小组产前护理提供了一种结构创新,使医护人员与患者有更多时间互动,从而有机会解决临床以及心理、社会和行为因素,以促进健康妊娠。研究结果对可持续产前服务的设计具有启示意义,可能有助于减少围产期不良结局中的种族差异。