Suppr超能文献

群组产前护理对新生儿的影响:加纳东部地区一项群组随机对照试验的结果。

The impact of group antenatal care on newborns: Results of a cluster randomized control trial in Eastern Region, Ghana.

机构信息

Dodowa Health Research Center, Ghana Health Service, Dodowa, Ghana.

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05225-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal recognition of neonatal danger signs following birth is a strong predictor of care-seeking for newborn illness, which increases the odds of newborn survival. However, research suggests that maternal knowledge of newborn danger signs is low. Similarly, maternal knowledge of optimal newborn care practices has also been shown to be low. Since both issues are typically addressed during antenatal care, this study sought to determine whether group antenatal care (G-ANC) could lead to improvements in maternal recognition of danger signs and knowledge of healthy newborn practices, as well as boosting postnatal care utilization.

METHODS

This cluster randomized controlled trial of G-ANC compared to routine individual antenatal care (I-ANC) was conducted at 14 health facilities in Ghana, West Africa, from July 2019 to July 2023. Facilities were randomized to intervention or control, and pregnant participants at each facility were recruited into groups and followed for the duration of their pregnancies. 1761 participants were recruited: 877 into G-ANC; 884 into I-ANC. Data collection occurred at enrollment (T0), 34 weeks' gestation to 3 weeks postdelivery (T1) and 6-12 weeks postpartum (T2). Comparisons were made across groups and over time using logistic regression adjusted for clustering.

RESULTS

Overall, knowledge of newborn danger signs was significantly higher for women in G-ANC, both in aggregate (13-point scale) and for many of the individual items over time. Likewise, knowledge of what is needed to keep a newborn healthy was higher among women in G-ANC compared to I-ANC over time for the aggregate (7-point scale) and for many of the individual items. Women in G-ANC were less likely to report postnatal visits for themselves and their babies within 2 days of delivery than women in I-ANC, and there was no difference between groups regarding postnatal visits at one week or 6 weeks after birth.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates that group ANC significantly improves knowledge of newborn danger signs and healthy newborn practices when compared to routine care, suggesting that the impact of G-ANC extends beyond impacts on maternal health. Further research elucidating care pathways for ill newborns and maternal behaviors around healthy newborn practices is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033003, Registered: July 25, 2019 Protocol Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508671/ .

摘要

背景

产妇在分娩后识别新生儿危险体征是寻求新生儿疾病护理的有力预测因素,这增加了新生儿存活的几率。然而,研究表明,产妇对新生儿危险体征的知识水平较低。同样,产妇对最佳新生儿护理实践的知识也被证明很低。由于这两个问题通常都在产前护理期间得到解决,因此本研究旨在确定群体产前护理(G-ANC)是否可以提高产妇对危险体征的识别能力和对健康新生儿护理实践的认识,并促进产后护理的利用。

方法

本项在加纳西部 14 家卫生机构进行的 G-ANC 与常规个体产前护理(I-ANC)的群组随机对照试验,于 2019 年 7 月至 2023 年 7 月进行。各机构随机分为干预组或对照组,各机构的孕妇参加者被招募到组中,并在整个妊娠期间进行随访。共招募了 1761 名参与者:877 名参加 G-ANC;884 名参加 I-ANC。数据收集在入组时(T0)、34 周妊娠至产后 3 周(T1)和产后 6-12 周(T2)进行。使用针对聚类的逻辑回归进行组间和随时间的比较。

结果

总体而言,G-ANC 中的女性对新生儿危险体征的认识明显高于 I-ANC,无论是在综合(13 分制)方面,还是在许多个别项目方面。同样,随着时间的推移,与 I-ANC 相比,G-ANC 中的女性对保持新生儿健康所需的知识也更高,无论是在综合(7 分制)方面,还是在许多个别项目方面。与 I-ANC 相比,G-ANC 中的女性在分娩后 2 天内报告自己和婴儿的产后访视的可能性较低,而两组在产后 1 周或 6 周后的产后访视没有差异。

结论

本研究表明,与常规护理相比,群体 ANC 显著提高了对新生儿危险体征和健康新生儿护理实践的认识,表明 G-ANC 的影响超出了对产妇健康的影响。需要进一步研究阐明新生儿患病的护理途径以及产妇对健康新生儿护理实践的行为。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04033003,注册日期:2019 年 7 月 25 日方案可在以下网址获得:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508671/

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0150/11572523/e5264b9985c7/12887_2024_5225_Fig2_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验