Reilly S, Graham-Jones S, Gaulton E, Davidson E
Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Jan;12(1):63-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00469.x.
The objective of the present study was to determine whether provision of health advocacy for homeless patients would reduce the burden of care for a primary healthcare team. The impact of a health advocacy intervention was assessed in a quasi-experimental, three-armed controlled trial. Homeless patients registering at an inner-city health centre were allocated in alternating periods to health advocacy (with or without outreach registration) or 'usual care' over a total intake period of 3 years. The client group were homeless people in hostels or other temporary accommodation in the Liverpool 8 area of the UK. The majority of participants (n = 400) were women (76%) in their twenties (mean age = 26.6 years). Most (63%) were temporarily housed at either one of the women's refuges or Liverpool City Council family hostels, and all were registered with an inner-city health centre. Data on health service utilisation over a 3-month period was collected for all clients recruited to the study and direct health service costs were measured. Homeless adults who were proactively registered by the health advocate on outreach visits to hostels made significantly less use of health centre resources whilst having more contact with the health advocate than patients who registered at the health centre at a time of need. There was no reduction in health centre workload when the offer of health advocacy was made after registration at the health centre. The additional costs of providing health advocacy were offset by a reduction in demand for health-centre-based care. The results demonstrate that health advocacy can alter the pattern of help-seeking by temporarily homeless adults. The intervention was cost-neutral. The short-term health service workload associated with symptomatic homeless patients requiring medication was not reduced, but outreach health advocacy was used successfully to address psycho-social issues and reduce the workload for primary care staff.
本研究的目的是确定为无家可归患者提供健康倡导服务是否会减轻基层医疗团队的护理负担。在一项准实验性的三臂对照试验中评估了健康倡导干预的效果。在三年的总接纳期内,在内城区健康中心登记的无家可归患者被交替分配到健康倡导组(有或无外展登记)或“常规护理”组。客户群体是英国利物浦8区收容所或其他临时住所中的无家可归者。大多数参与者(n = 400)是20多岁的女性(76%),平均年龄为26.6岁。大多数人(63%)临时居住在妇女庇护所或利物浦市议会家庭收容所中的一处,并且都在内城区健康中心登记。收集了所有纳入研究的客户在三个月期间的医疗服务利用数据,并测量了直接医疗服务成本。与在需要时在健康中心登记的患者相比,健康倡导者在外展访问收容所时主动登记的无家可归成年人对健康中心资源的使用明显减少,同时与健康倡导者的接触更多。在健康中心登记后提供健康倡导服务时,健康中心的工作量并没有减少。提供健康倡导服务的额外成本被基于健康中心的护理需求减少所抵消。结果表明,健康倡导可以改变临时无家可归成年人的求助模式。该干预在成本上是中性的。与需要药物治疗的有症状无家可归患者相关的短期医疗服务工作量没有减少,但外展健康倡导成功地用于解决心理社会问题并减轻了基层医疗人员的工作量。