Suppr超能文献

不稳定型股骨转子间髋部骨折的髓内固定:一枚或两枚拉力螺钉

Intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: one or two lag screws.

作者信息

Kubiak Erik N, Bong Mathew, Park Samuel S, Kummer Fred, Egol Kenneth, Koval Kenneth J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Jan;18(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200401000-00003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the screw sliding characteristics and biomechanical stability of four-part intertrochanteric hip fractures stabilized with an intramedullary nail using either one large-diameter lag screw (intramedullary hip screw [IMHS]; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) or two small-diameter lag screws (trochanteric antegrade nail [TAN]; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN).

DESIGN

Laboratory investigation using eight matched pairs of cadaveric human femurs with simulated, unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.

INTERVENTION

One femur of each matched pair was stabilized with an IMHS intramedullary nail, and the other was stabilized with a TAN intramedullary nail. Femurs were statically, then cyclically loaded on a servohydraulic materials testing machine. Finally, all specimens were loaded to failure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Screw sliding and inferior and lateral head displacements were measured for applied static loads from 500N to 1250N. The same measurements were obtained before and after cyclically loading the specimens at 1250N. Ultimate failure strength of the implant constructs also was determined.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the TAN and IMHS in static or cyclical loading with respect to screw sliding or inferior and lateral head displacements. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.02) in failure strength, with the IMHS construct failing at an average of 2162N and the TAN construct failing at an average of 3238N.

CONCLUSION

The two constructs showed equivalent rigidity and stability in all parameters assessed in elastic and cyclical tests. The TAN had a greater ultimate failure load.

摘要

目的

比较使用一枚大直径拉力螺钉(髓内髋螺钉[IMHS];史赛克公司,田纳西州孟菲斯)或两枚小直径拉力螺钉(股骨转子间顺行髓内钉[TAN];史赛克公司,田纳西州孟菲斯)固定的四部分股骨转子间髋部骨折,在使用髓内钉固定时的螺钉滑动特性和生物力学稳定性。

设计

使用八对匹配的尸体人股骨进行实验室研究,模拟不稳定的股骨转子间髋部骨折。

干预

每对匹配股骨中的一根用IMHS髓内钉固定,另一根用TAN髓内钉固定。股骨先进行静态加载,然后在伺服液压材料试验机上进行循环加载。最后,所有标本加载至失效。

主要观察指标

在500N至1250N的静态载荷下测量螺钉滑动以及股骨头下方和外侧的位移。在对标本进行1250N循环加载前后进行相同测量。还测定了植入物结构的极限破坏强度。

结果

在静态或循环加载下,就螺钉滑动或股骨头下方和外侧位移而言,TAN和IMHS之间无显著差异。在破坏强度方面存在统计学显著差异(P<0.02),IMHS结构平均在2162N时失效,TAN结构平均在3238N时失效。

结论

在弹性和循环测试评估的所有参数中,两种结构显示出同等的刚度和稳定性。TAN具有更大的极限破坏载荷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验