Suppr超能文献

采用双近端螺钉设计的股骨近端髓内钉治疗的粗隆间骨折中骨块穿出的危险因素。

Risk factors for cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail of double proximal screw design.

作者信息

Şişman Ali, Avci Özgür, Çepni Serdar Kamil, Batar Suat, Polat Ömer

机构信息

Umraniye Health Sciences University Training and Research Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Tavsanlı State Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tavsanlı, Kütahya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Mar 17;28:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101832. eCollection 2022 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFF) are often seen in the elderly after a simple fall because of osteoporosis, and treatment is generally provided with proximal femoral nail (PFN). The complication of cut-out, which can develop as a result of PFN treatment of IFF, is a significant cause of morbidity. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors for cut-out in cases treated with double proximal screw design nail (DPSDN).

METHODS

A retrospective examination was made of patients aged> 70 years, who were operated on for IFF using DPSDN between January 2018 and December 2020. A record was made of the potential risk factors of age, gender, osteoporosis level (Singh Osteoporosis Index), fracture classification (AO/OTA classification), reduction quality, tip-apex distance(calTAD), and proximal screw placement values. Using logistic regression analysis, it was attempted to determine predictive factors for cut-out complication in cases operated on with DPSDN.

RESULTS

With 219 cases included in the study, two groups were formed as cut-out and non-cut-out. Reduction quality, calTAD, and proximal screw placement were seen to be risk factors for cut-out. According to the univariate logistic regression analysis, the cut-out risk was 57.917-fold greater in those with "poor" reduction quality compared to those with "good" reduction quality, the risk was 17-fold greater in those with "superior"screw placement compared to "central" placement (p < 0.001), and 9.24-fold greater in those with "anterior" placement compared to "central" placement (p < 0.001). The cutoff value for calTAD for the diagnosis of cut-out was found to be > 25.5 mm (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated that the most important risk factors in the use of DPSDN are reduction quality, calTAD and proximal screw placement,. It was also concluded that just as in implants designed with a single screw, there is an increased risk when calTAD is > 25 mm.

摘要

背景

股骨粗隆间骨折(IFF)在老年人中因骨质疏松在简单跌倒后较为常见,治疗通常采用股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)。PFN治疗IFF可能出现的穿出并发症是发病的重要原因。本研究的目的是探讨采用双近端螺钉设计髓内钉(DPSDN)治疗的病例中穿出的危险因素。

方法

对2018年1月至2020年12月期间使用DPSDN接受IFF手术的70岁以上患者进行回顾性研究。记录年龄、性别、骨质疏松程度(辛格骨质疏松指数)、骨折分类(AO/OTA分类)、复位质量、尖顶距(calTAD)和近端螺钉置入值等潜在危险因素。使用逻辑回归分析,试图确定DPSDN手术病例中穿出并发症的预测因素。

结果

本研究纳入219例病例,分为穿出组和未穿出组。复位质量、calTAD和近端螺钉置入被视为穿出的危险因素。根据单因素逻辑回归分析,复位质量为“差”的患者穿出风险比“好”的患者高57.917倍,螺钉置入为“上”的患者风险比“中”的患者高17倍(p<0.001),“前”的患者风险比“中”的患者高9.24倍(p<0.001)。穿出诊断的calTAD临界值>25.5mm(p=0.026)。

结论

本研究结果表明,使用DPSDN时最重要的危险因素是复位质量、calTAD和近端螺钉置入。还得出结论,与单螺钉设计的植入物一样,当calTAD>25mm时风险增加。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail of double proximal screw design.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Mar 17;28:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101832. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.
Bone Joint J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1029-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33644.
6
Tip-apex distance as a risk factor for cut-out in cephalic double-screw nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures.
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Jun 2;5(6):457-463. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0163.R1.
7
Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
8
Influence of the PFNA screw position on the risk of cut-out in an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: a computational analysis.
Med Eng Phys. 2021 Nov;97:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treatment in Asia: What We Know and What the World Can Learn.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;51(2):189-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.11.011. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Intraoperative assessment of reduction quality during nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.
Injury. 2020 Feb;51(2):400-406. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.087. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
Injury. 2019 Apr;50(4):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Risk factors for cut-out after internal fixation of trochanteric fractures in elderly subjects.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1183-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Mar;138(3):351-359. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2863-z. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
9
Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验