Suppr超能文献

面向公众还是面向专业人士?——新的英国医学总会绩效程序

For public or profession?--The new GMC performance procedures.

作者信息

Stacey M

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Warwick, Coventry.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1085-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1085.

Abstract

The upheaval in the General Medical Council two decades ago came from doctors not the consumers the council was set up to protect. Since then there have been repeated calls for doctors to improve their self regulation by amending the disciplinary procedures. Private member's bills have failed and the GMC has now proposed performance procedures to deal with doctors who exhibit a "pattern of poor performance." After months of wide consultation in and outside the medical profession the GMC will decide next week whether to endorse the procedures, which unlike the conduct hearings will be inquiries by peers. Professor Margaret Stacey suggests that the procedures lack clarity, smacking of that "trust me" principle whose subtext is "but I'm not telling you what I'm up to."

摘要

二十年前,英国医学总会(General Medical Council)的动荡源自医生,而非该机构旨在保护的消费者。自那时起,人们不断呼吁医生通过修订惩戒程序来加强自我监管。下议院议员提出的法案未能通过,医学总会现提议实施绩效程序,以处理那些表现出“一贯不佳表现”的医生。在对医学界内外进行了数月广泛磋商之后,医学总会将于下周决定是否批准这些程序,与行为听证会不同,这些程序将由同行进行调查。玛格丽特·斯泰西教授认为,这些程序缺乏清晰度,带有那种“相信我”原则的意味,其潜台词是“但我不会告诉你我在做什么”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e03f/1883645/53207f3e3638/bmj00098-0052-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验