Suppr超能文献

英国医学总会简史。

A short history of the General Medical Council.

作者信息

Irvine Donald

机构信息

Picker Institute, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2006 Mar;40(3):202-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02397.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The General Medical Council (GMC) regulates British doctors through the Medical Act. The Council comprises doctors (who predominate) and laypeople. It registers doctors for UK practice, sets professional standards, regulates basic medical education, and manages doctors' fitness to practise. The GMC sits uneasily at the interface between the medical profession, the public, Parliament and the National Health Service. Herein lie the seeds of inertia and conflict.

A TRADITIONAL REGULATOR

The early GMC mainly managed serious complaints against doctors. Reactive, passive and distant from doctors, it was reconstituted in 1979 after it lost their confidence. At this point the public became increasingly impatient with the GMC because it appeared to be too protective of doctors and unwilling to tackle poor practice. When it did respond, its actions were perceived as too little, too late. Public pressure accelerated radical change following the 1990s crisis in paediatric cardiac surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary.

NEW PROFESSIONALISM

In the 1990s, the GMC itself set a new direction. There was more public involvement. A statement of professional standards -Good Medical Practice- was agreed between profession and public. The standards are tied to licensure, medical education and workplace clinical governance, and are to be observed by all doctors. The biggest change is the plan to evaluate doctors' practice regularly through revalidation in the form of relicensure.

CONCLUSION

All patients are entitled to a good doctor. The challenge to the profession and the GMC is to ensure they fulfil this entitlement by implementing professional regulation effectively.

摘要

引言

英国医学总会(GMC)通过《医疗法案》对英国医生进行监管。该委员会由医生(占多数)和非专业人士组成。它为在英国执业的医生进行注册,制定专业标准,规范基础医学教育,并管理医生的执业资格。GMC在医学专业、公众、议会和国民医疗服务体系之间的界面上处境尴尬。这其中存在着惰性和冲突的根源。

传统监管机构

早期的GMC主要处理对医生的严重投诉。它反应迟钝、消极被动,与医生保持距离,在失去医生信任后于1979年进行了重组。此时,公众对GMC越来越不耐烦,因为它似乎过于偏袒医生,不愿处理不当的医疗行为。当它做出回应时,其行动被认为力度太小、为时已晚。在20世纪90年代布里斯托尔皇家医院小儿心脏手术危机之后,公众压力加速了彻底变革。

新的职业精神

20世纪90年代,GMC自身设定了新的方向。公众参与度更高。专业标准声明——《良好医疗行为规范》——在专业人士和公众之间达成一致。这些标准与执照发放、医学教育和工作场所临床治理相关联,所有医生都应遵守。最大的变化是计划通过以重新注册形式进行的再认证来定期评估医生的执业情况。

结论

所有患者都有权获得优秀的医生。该专业领域和GMC面临的挑战是通过有效实施专业监管来确保他们实现这一权利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验