Sithiprasasna Ratana, Mahapibul Pradith, Noigamol Chumnong, Perich Michael J, Zeichner Brian C, Burge Bob, Norris Sarah L W, Jones James W, Schleich Sonya S, Coleman Russell E
Department of Entomology, U.S. Army Medical Component, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Entomol. 2003 Jul;40(4):455-62. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-40.4.455.
In 1999 and 2000 we evaluated a lethal ovitrap (LO) for the control of Aedes aegypti (L.) in three villages in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. Two blocks of 50 houses (a minimum of 250 m apart) served as treatment and control sites in each village, with each house in the treatment area receiving 10 LOs. Thirty houses in the center of each treatment and control block were selected as sampling sites, with larval and adult mosquito sampling initiated when LOs were placed. Sampling was conducted weekly in 10 of the 30 houses at each site, with each block of 10 houses sampled every third week. Sampling continued for 30 wk. Efficacy of the LO was evaluated by determining number of containers with larvae and/or pupae per house and number of adult mosquitoes collected inside each house. In 1999, the LO had a negligible impact on all measures of Ae. aegypti abundance that were assessed; however, fungal contamination of insecticide-impregnated strips may have been responsible for the low efficacy. In 2000, significant suppression was achieved based on changes in multiple entomologic criteria (containers with larvae, containers with pupae, and number of adult Ae. aegypti); however, control was not absolute and neither immature nor adult Ae. aegypti were ever eliminated completely. We conclude that the LO can reduce adult Ae. aegypti populations in Thailand; however, efficacy of the LO is lower than desired due primarily to the high number of alternative oviposition sites. LO efficacy may be improved when used as part of an integrated control program that places emphasis on reduction of adjacent larval habitats. Further studies are required to assess this issue.
1999年和2000年,我们在泰国叻丕府的三个村庄评估了一种用于控制埃及伊蚊的致死性诱蚊产卵器(LO)。每个村庄有两个由50栋房屋组成的街区(相距至少250米)作为处理区和对照区,处理区内的每栋房屋放置10个致死性诱蚊产卵器。在每个处理区和对照区的中心选择30栋房屋作为采样点,放置致死性诱蚊产卵器后开始对幼虫和成虫进行采样。每个采样点每周在30栋房屋中的10栋进行采样,每10栋房屋组成的街区每三周采样一次。采样持续30周。通过确定每户有幼虫和/或蛹的容器数量以及每户屋内采集到的成年蚊子数量来评估致死性诱蚊产卵器的效果。1999年,致死性诱蚊产卵器对所评估的埃及伊蚊数量的所有指标影响可忽略不计;然而,杀虫剂浸渍条的真菌污染可能是导致效果不佳的原因。2000年,基于多个昆虫学标准(有幼虫的容器、有蛹的容器和成年埃及伊蚊数量)的变化实现了显著抑制;然而,控制并非绝对,未成熟和成年埃及伊蚊都从未被完全消灭。我们得出结论,致死性诱蚊产卵器可以减少泰国成年埃及伊蚊种群数量;然而,致死性诱蚊产卵器的效果低于预期,主要原因是替代产卵场所数量众多。当作为综合控制计划的一部分使用,重点是减少相邻幼虫栖息地时,致死性诱蚊产卵器的效果可能会提高。需要进一步研究来评估这个问题。