• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基于社区的房屋内埃及伊蚊控制策略。

Evaluation of community-based strategies for Aedes aegypti control inside houses.

作者信息

Ocampo Clara B, González Camila, Morales Carlos A, Pérez Mauricio, Wesson Dawn, Apperson Charles S

机构信息

Unidad de Entomología Médica, Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Call, Colombia.

出版信息

Biomedica. 2009 Jun;29(2):282-97.

PMID:20128353
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dengue viruses transmitted principally by the urban mosquito Aedes aegypti, cause one of the major public health problems confronting tropical cities. Insecticide spraying has been the mainstay of mosquito control; however, its continuous use has selected for resistance. Other important methods of control involve community participation.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated two control methods for Ae. aegypti that can be used by the community: Lethal ovitraps (LOs) and Bacillus thuringiensis var israeliensis (Bti) briquettes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The project study was carried out in four similar neighborhoods within a representative district in the city of Cali, Colombia. Three interventions (LO, Bti, LO+Bti plus education and one control (education only) area were evaluated for efficacy in post-intervention entomological surveys. Additionally, entomological indices were also compared to results from a pre-intervention survey carried out on a sample of city blocks in the same neighborhoods. Relative vector abundance in relation to weather conditions using the same entomological sampling methods was compared.

RESULTS

The interventions did not achieve significant differences in vector abundance among the treatments. However, the interventions achieved a significant reduction in entomological indices compared with those observed during the pre-intervention survey: House index 15.1% vs. 8.5%, mean pupae per house 1.15 vs. 0.073, and Adult index 56.3% vs. 34.8% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of significant differences among the interventions, and between treated and control blocks suggested that educational activities together with periodic visits to the houses produced similar reductions of immature and adult Aedes aegypti.

摘要

引言

主要由城市蚊虫埃及伊蚊传播的登革病毒,是热带城市面临的主要公共卫生问题之一。喷洒杀虫剂一直是蚊虫控制的主要手段;然而,持续使用已导致蚊虫产生抗药性。其他重要的控制方法包括社区参与。

目的

本研究评估了两种可供社区使用的埃及伊蚊控制方法:致命性诱蚊产卵器(LOs)和以色列亚种苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bti)型煤球。

材料与方法

该项目研究在哥伦比亚卡利市一个代表性区域内的四个类似社区进行。在干预后的昆虫学调查中,对三种干预措施(LO、Bti、LO + Bti加上教育)和一个对照(仅教育)区域的效果进行了评估。此外,还将昆虫学指标与在相同社区的城市街区样本上进行的干预前调查结果进行了比较。使用相同的昆虫学采样方法,比较了与天气条件相关的相对病媒丰度。

结果

各处理组之间在病媒丰度上未达到显著差异。然而,与干预前调查期间观察到的情况相比,这些干预措施使昆虫学指标显著降低:房屋指数从15.1%降至8.5%,每户平均蛹数从1.15降至0.073,成虫指数从56.3%降至34.8%(p < 0.05)。

结论

干预措施之间以及处理街区和对照街区之间缺乏显著差异,这表明教育活动以及定期走访房屋对埃及伊蚊幼虫和成虫数量的减少产生了类似的效果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of community-based strategies for Aedes aegypti control inside houses.评估基于社区的房屋内埃及伊蚊控制策略。
Biomedica. 2009 Jun;29(2):282-97.
2
[Ovitraps evaluation for surveillance and control of Aedes aegypti in two urban settlements of Urabá, Antioquia].[在安蒂奥基亚省乌拉瓦的两个城市住区使用诱蚊产卵器评估埃及伊蚊的监测与控制情况]
Biomedica. 2014 Jul-Sep;34(3):409-24. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572014000300011.
3
Field evaluation of a lethal ovitrap against dengue vectors in Brazil.巴西用于登革热媒介控制的致死性诱蚊产卵器的现场评估
Med Vet Entomol. 2003 Jun;17(2):205-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00427.x.
4
Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by adoption of eco-health methods in Chennai City, India.印度钦奈市采用生态健康方法进行基于社区的埃及伊蚊控制。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):488-96. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000056.
5
Evaluation of the present dengue situation and control strategies against Aedes aegypti in Cebu City, Philippines.菲律宾宿务市登革热现状评估及针对埃及伊蚊的防控策略
J Vector Ecol. 2005 Dec;30(2):277-83.
6
[Evaluation of lethal ovitraps as a strategy for Aedes aegypti control].[评估致死性诱蚊产卵器作为埃及伊蚊控制策略的效果]
Biomedica. 2014 Jul-Sep;34(3):473-82. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572014000300016.
7
A lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: II. Impact on populations of the mosquito Aedes aegypti.澳大利亚一种基于诱蚊产卵器的登革热致死性大规模诱捕方案:II. 对埃及伊蚊种群的影响。
Med Vet Entomol. 2009 Dec;23(4):303-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00834.x.
8
Dengue vector control and surveillance during a major outbreak in a coastal Red Sea area in Sudan.登革热媒介控制和监测在苏丹红海地区的一次重大疫情爆发期间。
East Mediterr Health J. 2012 Dec;18(12):1217-24.
9
Is routine dengue vector surveillance in central Brazil able to accurately monitor the Aedes aegypti population? Results from a pupal productivity survey.巴西中部常规登革热媒介监测能否准确监测埃及伊蚊种群?蛹生产力调查结果。
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Sep;16(9):1143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02818.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
10
Knowledge, practices and entomological aspects of dengue in Medellín, Colombia: A comparative study of neighborhoods with high and low incidence.哥伦比亚麦德林登革热的知识、实践及昆虫学方面:高发病率和低发病率社区的比较研究
Biomedica. 2018 Aug 1;38(0):106-116. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v38i0.3957.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive scoping review of global educational strategies and outcomes in aedes-borne disease control.关于伊蚊传播疾病控制的全球教育策略及成果的全面范围综述。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;82(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01412-3.
2
Current evidences of the efficacy of mosquito mass-trapping interventions to reduce Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus populations and Aedes-borne virus transmission.当前利用大规模诱蚊捕蚊干预减少埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊种群及蚊媒病毒传播的效果证据。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Mar 6;17(3):e0011153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011153. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Effectiveness of Aedes-borne infectious disease control in Latin America and the Caribbean region: A scoping review.
拉丁美洲和加勒比地区伊蚊传播传染病控制的有效性:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0277038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277038. eCollection 2022.
4
Efficacy of Treatment on Aedes Population Using Different Applications at High-Rise Buildings.在高层建筑中使用不同施药方式对伊蚊种群的防治效果
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 May 1;5(2):67. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed5020067.
5
Impact, economic evaluation, and sustainability of integrated vector management in urban settings to prevent vector-borne diseases: a scoping review.城市环境中综合病媒管理预防病媒传播疾病的影响、经济评估和可持续性:范围综述。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Sep 3;7(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0464-x.
6
Exploring scenarios of chikungunya mitigation with a data-driven agent-based model of the 2014-2016 outbreak in Colombia.运用基于数据的agent-based 模型探索 2014-2016 年哥伦比亚基孔肯雅热疫情缓解方案。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 15;8(1):12201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30647-8.
7
Assessing the effects of interventions for Aedes aegypti control: systematic review and meta-analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials.评估埃及伊蚊控制干预措施的效果:群组随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4290-z.
8
A prospective cohort study to assess seroprevalence, incidence, knowledge, attitudes and practices, willingness to pay for vaccine and related risk factors in dengue in a high incidence setting.一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在评估高发病率地区登革热的血清阳性率、发病率、知识、态度和行为、支付疫苗费用的意愿以及相关风险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2055-4.
9
Meta-analysis of studies on chemical, physical and biological agents in the control of Aedes aegypti.关于化学、物理和生物制剂控制埃及伊蚊的研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 4;15:858. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2199-y.
10
Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance.使用MosquiTRAPs进行大规模诱捕并不能降低埃及伊蚊的数量。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015 Jun;110(4):517-27. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760140374. Epub 2015 Apr 28.