Kubicki M, McCarley R W, Nestor P G, Huh T, Kikinis R, Shenton M E, Wible C G
Clinical Neuroscience Division, Laboratory of Neuroscience, Boston VA Healthcare System-Brockton Division, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Brockton, MA 02301, USA.
Neuroimage. 2003 Dec;20(4):1923-33. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00383-5.
As a means toward understanding the neural bases of schizophrenic thought disturbance, we examined brain activation patterns in response to semantically and superficially encoded words in patients with schizophrenia. Nine male schizophrenic and 9 male control subjects were tested in a visual levels of processing (LOP) task first outside the magnet and then during the fMRI scanning procedures (using a different set of words). During the experiments visual words were presented under two conditions. Under the deep, semantic encoding condition, subjects made semantic judgments as to whether the words were abstract or concrete. Under the shallow, nonsemantic encoding condition, subjects made perceptual judgments of the font size (uppercase/lowercase) of the presented words. After performance of the behavioral task, a recognition test was used to assess the depth of processing effect, defined as better performance for semantically encoded words than for perceptually encoded words. For the scanned version only, the words for both conditions were repeated in order to assess repetition-priming effects. Reaction times were assessed in both testing scenarios. Both groups showed the expected depth of processing effect for recognition, and control subjects showed the expected increased activation of the left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPC) under semantic encoding relative to perceptual encoding conditions as well as repetition priming for semantic conditions only. In contrast, schizophrenics showed similar patterns of fMRI activation regardless of condition. Most striking in relation to controls, patients showed decreased LIFC activation concurrent with increased left superior temporal gyrus activation for semantic encoding versus shallow encoding. Furthermore, schizophrenia subjects did not show the repetition priming effect, either behaviorally or as a decrease in LIPC activity. In patients with schizophrenia, LIFC underactivation and left superior temporal gyrus overactivation for semantically encoded words may reflect a disease-related disruption of a distributed frontal temporal network that is engaged in the representation and processing of meaning of words, text, and discourse and which may underlie schizophrenic thought disturbance.
作为理解精神分裂症思维障碍神经基础的一种方法,我们研究了精神分裂症患者对语义编码和表面编码单词的脑激活模式。9名男性精神分裂症患者和9名男性对照受试者首先在磁体外部,然后在功能磁共振成像扫描过程中(使用不同的单词集)进行视觉加工水平(LOP)任务测试。在实验过程中,视觉单词在两种条件下呈现。在深度语义编码条件下,受试者对单词是抽象的还是具体的进行语义判断。在浅度非语义编码条件下,受试者对呈现单词的字体大小(大写/小写)进行感知判断。在完成行为任务后,使用识别测试来评估加工深度效应,定义为语义编码单词的表现优于感知编码单词。仅对于扫描版本,两种条件下的单词都重复呈现,以评估重复启动效应。在两种测试场景中都评估了反应时间。两组在识别方面都表现出预期的加工深度效应,并且对照受试者在语义编码相对于感知编码条件下表现出预期的左下前额叶皮层(LIPC)激活增加,以及仅在语义条件下的重复启动效应。相比之下,无论条件如何,精神分裂症患者都表现出相似的功能磁共振成像激活模式。与对照组相比最显著的是,患者在语义编码与浅度编码时,左下前额叶皮层激活减少,同时左上颞回激活增加。此外,精神分裂症受试者在行为上或作为LIPC活动的减少都没有表现出重复启动效应。在精神分裂症患者中,语义编码单词的左下前额叶皮层激活不足和左上颞回激活过度可能反映了与疾病相关的分布式额颞网络的破坏,该网络参与单词、文本和语篇意义的表征和加工,并且可能是精神分裂症思维障碍的基础。