Ragland J D, Moelter S T, Bhati M T, Valdez J N, Kohler C G, Siegel S J, Gur R C, Gur R E
University of California at Davis, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb;99(1-3):312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.017. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
Verbal fluency deficits in schizophrenia are difficult to interpret because the tasks are multi-factorial and groups differ in total words generated. We manipulated retrieval and switching demands by requiring alternation between over-learned sequences in which retrieval is relatively automatic (OS) and semantic categories requiring increased retrieval effort (SC). Controlled processing was also manipulated by including switching and non-switching conditions, and formal thought disorder (FTD) was assessed with the communication disorders index (CDI). The OS/SC semantic fluency paradigm was administered during fMRI to 13 patients with schizophrenia and 14 matched controls. Images were acquired on a 3 Tesla Siemens scanner using compressed image acquisition to allow for cued overt word production. Subjects alternated between OS, SC, OS-switch, SC-switch, and baseline blocks. Images were pre-processed in SPM-2, and a two-stage random effects analysis tested within and between group contrasts. There were no group performance differences. fMRI analysis did not reveal any group differences during the OS non-switching condition. Both groups produced expected activation in bilateral prefrontal and inferior parietal regions. However, during the SC condition patients had greater activation than controls in left prefrontal, right anterior cingulate, right superior temporal, bilateral thalamus, and left parietal regions. There was also evidence of patient over-activation in prefrontal, superior temporal, superior parietal, and visual association areas when a switching component was added. FTD was negatively correlated with BOLD response in the right anterior cingulate, cuneus and superior frontal gyrus during increased retrieval demand, and positively correlated with fMRI activation in the left lingual gyrus, right fusiform gyrus and left superior parietal lobule during increased switching demand. These results indicate that patients are able to successfully perform effortful semantic fluency tasks during non-speeded conditions. When retrieval is relatively automatic there does not appear to be an effect of schizophrenia on fMRI response. However, when retrieval and controlled processing demands increase, patients have greater activation than controls despite unimpaired task performance. This inefficient BOLD response may explain why patients are slower and less accurate on standard self-paced fluency tasks.
精神分裂症患者的言语流畅性缺陷难以解释,因为这些任务具有多因素性,且不同组在生成的总单词数上存在差异。我们通过要求在过度学习的序列(其中检索相对自动,即OS)和需要增加检索努力的语义类别(即SC)之间交替,来操纵检索和切换需求。还通过纳入切换和非切换条件来操纵控制性加工,并使用沟通障碍指数(CDI)评估形式思维障碍(FTD)。在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间,对13名精神分裂症患者和14名匹配的对照组进行了OS/SC语义流畅性范式测试。使用压缩图像采集在3特斯拉西门子扫描仪上采集图像,以允许进行提示性的公开单词生成。受试者在OS、SC、OS-切换、SC-切换和基线块之间交替。图像在SPM-2中进行预处理,并进行两阶段随机效应分析以测试组内和组间对比。两组在表现上没有差异。fMRI分析未发现OS非切换条件下的任何组间差异。两组在双侧前额叶和顶下区域均产生了预期的激活。然而,在SC条件下,患者在左前额叶、右前扣带回、右颞上回、双侧丘脑和左顶叶区域的激活比对照组更强。当添加切换成分时,也有证据表明患者在前额叶、颞上回、顶上回和视觉联合区域存在过度激活。在检索需求增加时,FTD与右前扣带回、楔叶和额上回的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)反应呈负相关,而在切换需求增加时,与左舌回、右梭状回和左顶上小叶的fMRI激活呈正相关。这些结果表明,患者能够在非快速条件下成功完成需要努力的语义流畅性任务。当检索相对自动时,精神分裂症似乎对fMRI反应没有影响。然而,当检索和控制性加工需求增加时,尽管任务表现未受损,但患者的激活比对照组更强。这种低效的BOLD反应可能解释了为什么患者在标准的自定节奏流畅性任务中速度较慢且准确性较低。