Goel Vinod, Dolan Raymond J
Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Queens Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Neuroimage. 2003 Dec;20(4):2314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.027.
Logic is widely considered the basis of rationality. Logical choices, however, are often influenced by emotional responses, sometimes to our detriment, sometimes to our advantage. To understand the neural basis of emotionally neutral ("cold") and emotionally salient ("hot") reasoning we studied 19 volunteers using event-related fMRI, as they made logical judgments about arguments that varied in emotional saliency. Despite identical logical form and content categories across "hot" and "cold" reasoning conditions, lateral and ventral medial prefrontal cortex showed reciprocal response patterns as a function of emotional saliency of content. "Cold" reasoning trials resulted in enhanced activity in lateral/dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (L/DLPFC) and suppression of activity in ventral medial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC). By contrast, "hot" reasoning trials resulted in enhanced activation in VMPFC and suppression of activation in L/DLPFC. This reciprocal engagement of L/DLPFC and VMPFC provides evidence for a dynamic neural system for reasoning, the configuration of which is strongly influenced by emotional saliency.
逻辑被广泛认为是理性的基础。然而,逻辑选择往往受到情绪反应的影响,有时对我们不利,有时对我们有利。为了理解情感中立(“冷”)和情感显著(“热”)推理的神经基础,我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究了19名志愿者,他们对情感显著性不同的论点进行逻辑判断。尽管在“热”和“冷”推理条件下逻辑形式和内容类别相同,但外侧和腹内侧前额叶皮层根据内容的情感显著性呈现出相反的反应模式。“冷”推理试验导致外侧/背外侧前额叶皮层(L/DLPFC)活动增强,腹内侧前额叶皮层(VMPFC)活动受到抑制。相比之下,“热”推理试验导致VMPFC激活增强,L/DLPFC激活受到抑制。L/DLPFC和VMPFC的这种相反参与为推理的动态神经系统提供了证据,其结构受到情感显著性的强烈影响。