Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar;239(3):857-865. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-06022-3. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Interoception and impulsivity are two multi-dimensional constructs and although the role of interoception in impulsiveness has been previously reported, it is not clear whether their different facets are related to each other. In the present study, we aimed at bridging this gap by investigating the relationships between interoception and impulsivity in the light of their multi-dimensional nature. To this aim, we conducted a cross-task comparison and assessed in the same sample of healthy participants, interoceptive accuracy, by the heartbeat perception task, interoceptive sensibility, by a self-reported measure, "hot" impulsivity, by a behavioural task of risk taking, and "cool" impulsivity, by a go/no-go task. Also, we assessed trait impulsivity by a self-report measure. We found that interoceptive sensibility contributed to "hot" impulsivity, while interoceptive accuracy was related to non-planning trait impulsivity. These findings underscore the need to investigate at a finer grain the relationships between these two complex, multi-dimensional constructs.
内感受和冲动性是两个多维结构,尽管内感受在冲动性中的作用以前已经有报道,但它们的不同方面是否相互关联还不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在通过调查内感受和冲动性之间的关系来填补这一空白,考虑到它们的多维性质。为此,我们进行了跨任务比较,并在同一组健康参与者中评估了心跳感知任务的内感受准确性、自我报告的“热”冲动性测量的内感受敏感性、风险承担行为任务的“热”冲动性和 Go/No-Go 任务的“冷”冲动性。此外,我们还通过自我报告的测量评估了特质冲动性。我们发现,内感受敏感性与“热”冲动性有关,而内感受准确性与非计划性特质冲动性有关。这些发现强调了需要更精细地研究这两个复杂的多维结构之间的关系。