Drewnowski Adam, Specter S E
Center for Public Health Nutrition, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jan;79(1):6-16. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.1.6.
Many health disparities in the United States are linked to inequalities in education and income. This review focuses on the relation between obesity and diet quality, dietary energy density, and energy costs. Evidence is provided to support the following points. First, the highest rates of obesity occur among population groups with the highest poverty rates and the least education. Second, there is an inverse relation between energy density (MJ/kg) and energy cost (US dollars/MJ), such that energy-dense foods composed of refined grains, added sugars, or fats may represent the lowest-cost option to the consumer. Third, the high energy density and palatability of sweets and fats are associated with higher energy intakes, at least in clinical and laboratory studies. Fourth, poverty and food insecurity are associated with lower food expenditures, low fruit and vegetable consumption, and lower-quality diets. A reduction in diet costs in linear programming models leads to high-fat, energy-dense diets that are similar in composition to those consumed by low-income groups. Such diets are more affordable than are prudent diets based on lean meats, fish, fresh vegetables, and fruit. The association between poverty and obesity may be mediated, in part, by the low cost of energy-dense foods and may be reinforced by the high palatability of sugar and fat. This economic framework provides an explanation for the observed links between socioeconomic variables and obesity when taste, dietary energy density, and diet costs are used as intervening variables. More and more Americans are becoming overweight and obese while consuming more added sugars and fats and spending a lower percentage of their disposable income on food.
美国许多健康差异都与教育和收入不平等有关。本综述重点关注肥胖与饮食质量、膳食能量密度和能量成本之间的关系。现提供证据支持以下观点。第一,肥胖率最高的人群是贫困率最高且受教育程度最低的人群。第二,能量密度(兆焦耳/千克)与能量成本(美元/兆焦耳)之间呈负相关,因此由精制谷物、添加糖或脂肪组成的高能量密度食物可能是消费者成本最低的选择。第三,至少在临床和实验室研究中,甜食和脂肪的高能量密度和适口性与更高的能量摄入量有关。第四,贫困和粮食不安全与食品支出较低、水果和蔬菜消费量低以及饮食质量较差有关。线性规划模型中饮食成本的降低会导致高脂肪、高能量密度的饮食,其成分与低收入群体所消费的饮食相似。这类饮食比以瘦肉、鱼类、新鲜蔬菜和水果为基础的健康饮食更实惠。贫困与肥胖之间的关联可能部分是由高能量密度食物的低成本介导的,并且可能因糖和脂肪的高适口性而加剧。当将口味、膳食能量密度和饮食成本用作干预变量时,这个经济框架为观察到的社会经济变量与肥胖之间的联系提供了解释。越来越多的美国人在摄入更多添加糖和脂肪的同时,体重超重和肥胖,并且在食品上花费的可支配收入比例降低。