Suppr超能文献

肠易激综合征的分型:从最初的罗马标准到罗马II标准

Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria.

作者信息

Mearin Fermin, Roset Montse, Badía Xavier, Balboa Agustin, Baró Eva, Ponce Julio, Díaz-Rubio Manuel, Caldwell Ellen, Cucala Mercedes, Fueyo Arturo, Talley Nicholas J

机构信息

Institute of Functional and Motor Digestive Disorders, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):122-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04024.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other functional bowel disorders (FBD) is based on symptom evaluation. Clinical criteria have changed over time, yielding different proportions of subjects fulfilling diagnostic requirements. According to new diagnostic criteria (Rome II), subjects considered some years ago to have IBS no longer do so. The aim of this article is to evaluate how patients diagnosed as having IBS according to original Rome criteria have been split, and to which clinical diagnosis they belong today.

METHODS

Two hundred and eleven subjects meeting original Rome IBS diagnostic criteria were studied: 65 also met Rome II criteria while 146 did not. Subjects were extracted from an epidemiological survey, using home-based personal interviews, on 2000 subjects randomly selected as representative of the Spanish population. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were compared.

RESULTS

Of the subjects meeting original Rome but not Rome II criteria, the present diagnosis should be: 40%"minor" IBS (IBS symptoms of less than 12 wk duration), 37% functional constipation, 12% alternating bowel habit, 7% functional diarrhea, 3% functional abdominal bloating, and 1% unspecified functional bowel disorder (FBD). Thus, 52 subjects (36%) should not be diagnosed with IBS because they really had other FBD, 59 (40%) because of symptoms consistent with IBD diagnosis but not the required duration or frequency, and 35 (24%) because of symptoms consistent with some other FBD diagnosis but not meeting the required duration. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and HRQOL were more severely affected in IBS than in other FBD as a group, and in "major" rather than in "minor" forms.

CONCLUSIONS

Many subjects meeting original Rome criteria for IBS do not meet Rome II criteria: approximately one quarter of subjects do not have sufficient symptom duration or frequency to be diagnosed with IBS and almost half are now considered as having other ("major" or "minor") FBD.

摘要

目的

肠易激综合征(IBS)及其他功能性肠病(FBD)的诊断基于症状评估。临床标准随时间推移发生了变化,导致符合诊断要求的受试者比例有所不同。根据新的诊断标准(罗马Ⅱ标准),一些几年前被认为患有IBS的受试者现在不再符合该诊断。本文旨在评估那些根据最初的罗马标准被诊断为IBS的患者是如何被重新分类的,以及他们如今属于何种临床诊断。

方法

对211名符合最初罗马IBS诊断标准的受试者进行研究:其中65名也符合罗马Ⅱ标准,而146名不符合。这些受试者来自一项对2000名随机选取的、作为西班牙人口代表的受试者进行的流行病学调查,采用基于家庭的个人访谈方式。比较了他们的临床症状、个人健康状况、资源利用情况以及健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。

结果

在符合最初罗马标准但不符合罗马Ⅱ标准的受试者中,目前的诊断应为:40%为“轻度”IBS(IBS症状持续时间少于12周),37%为功能性便秘,12%为肠道习惯交替,7%为功能性腹泻,3%为功能性腹胀,1%为未特定的功能性肠病(FBD)。因此,52名受试者(36%)不应被诊断为IBS,因为他们实际患有其他FBD;59名(40%)是因为症状符合IBD诊断但持续时间或频率未达要求;35名(24%)是因为症状符合其他FBD诊断但未满足所需持续时间。总体而言,IBS患者的临床症状、个人健康状况、资源利用情况和HRQOL比其他FBD患者受影响更严重,且“重度”IBS比“轻度”IBS更严重。

结论

许多符合最初罗马IBS标准的受试者不符合罗马Ⅱ标准:约四分之一的受试者症状持续时间或频率不足以诊断为IBS,近一半的受试者现在被认为患有其他(“重度”或“轻度”)FBD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验