• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马IV标准对中国肠易激综合征患者有何影响?

What impact do Rome IV criteria have on patients with IBS in China?

作者信息

Wang Bin, Zhao Wei, Zhao Chunshan, Jin Hong, Zhang Lili, Chen Qiuyu, Wang Bangmao

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;54(12):1433-1440. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1698650. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1080/00365521.2019.1698650
PMID:31829752
Abstract

The Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal diseases (FGIDs) have been updated from Rome III to Rome IV. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the update on patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in China. A previous database including consecutive patients with FGIDs (according to Rome III criteria) from gastrointestinal department of a tertiary hospital in China was re-analyzed. Demographic information, clinical symptoms, psychological status (Zung self-rating scale), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) were compared between patients with Rome III and Rome IV IBS. Of the 946 patients with FGIDs, only 58 (6.1%) were diagnosed with Rome IV IBS [less than 292 (30.9%) under Rome III criteria] with a surge of the number of unspecified functional bowel disorders (U-FBD). All patients with IBS were divided into three groups: group A [meeting both Rome III and IV criteria, accounting for 43 (4.6%) of patients with FGIDs], group B [meeting only Rome III criteria, 249 (26.3%)], and group C [meeting only Rome IV criteria,15 (1.6%)]. Significant differences in frequency and severity of symptoms, subtypes, and sleep quality among groups (all  < .05) were found. Patients with Rome III IBS having sleep disorder tended to be more serious than those without. On the contrary, it was not the case under Rome IV criteria. Number of IBS patients was greatly reduced accompanied by a surge in U-FBD. Besides, the updated criteria also had great impacts on clinical parameters, sleep quality and psychological state of IBS patients.HighlightsRome IV criteria removed the description of abdominal discomfort for IBS.The updated Rome criteria had great impacts on IBS patients in our database.Our study analyzed the characteristics of IBS patients who fulfilled both criteria.Alterations in the Rome criteria also led to changes in the disease spectrum of FBD.

摘要

功能性胃肠病(FGIDs)的罗马标准已从罗马Ⅲ更新至罗马Ⅳ。本研究旨在探讨该更新对中国肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的影响。对来自中国一家三级医院消化内科的既往数据库(包含根据罗马Ⅲ标准连续纳入的FGIDs患者)进行重新分析。比较了罗马Ⅲ型和罗马Ⅳ型IBS患者的人口统计学信息、临床症状、心理状态(zung自评量表)和睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)。在946例FGIDs患者中,仅58例(6.1%)被诊断为罗马Ⅳ型IBS[低于罗马Ⅲ标准下的292例(30.9%)],未特定的功能性肠病(U-FBD)数量激增。所有IBS患者分为三组:A组[同时符合罗马Ⅲ和Ⅳ标准,占FGIDs患者的43例(4.6%)]、B组[仅符合罗马Ⅲ标准,249例(26.3%)]和C组[仅符合罗马Ⅳ标准,15例(1.6%)]。发现各组在症状频率和严重程度、亚型及睡眠质量方面存在显著差异(均P<0.05)。有睡眠障碍的罗马Ⅲ型IBS患者往往比无睡眠障碍者更严重。相反,在罗马Ⅳ标准下情况并非如此。IBS患者数量大幅减少,同时U-FBD数量激增。此外,更新后的标准对IBS患者的临床参数、睡眠质量和心理状态也有很大影响。

要点

罗马Ⅳ标准删除了IBS腹部不适的描述。

更新后的罗马标准对我们数据库中的IBS患者有很大影响。

我们的研究分析了符合两种标准的IBS患者的特征。

罗马标准的改变也导致了FBD疾病谱的变化。

相似文献

1
What impact do Rome IV criteria have on patients with IBS in China?罗马IV标准对中国肠易激综合征患者有何影响?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;54(12):1433-1440. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1698650. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
2
What Is Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder? A Commonly Seen, Rarely Recognized, and Poorly Understood Diagnosis.未特定功能性肠紊乱是什么?一种常见但鲜为人知且了解甚少的诊断。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 1;118(8):1402-1409. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002281. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
How the Change in IBS Criteria From Rome III to Rome IV Impacts on Clinical Characteristics and Key Pathophysiological Factors.罗马 III 标准向罗马 IV 标准转变如何影响 IBS 的临床特征和关键病理生理因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;113(7):1017-1025. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0074-z. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Functional gastrointestinal disorders in eating disorder patients: altered distribution and predictors using ROME III compared to ROME II criteria.饮食失调患者的功能性胃肠疾病:与罗马II标准相比,使用罗马III标准时分布的改变及预测因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 21;20(43):16293-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16293.
5
Multicenter observational study on functional bowel disorders diagnosed using Rome III diagnostic criteria in Japan.日本采用罗马 III 诊断标准诊断功能性肠病的多中心观察性研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;53(8):916-923. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1428-9. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Epidemiological, Clinical, and Psychological Characteristics of Individuals with Self-reported Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on the Rome IV vs Rome III Criteria.基于罗马 IV 标准与罗马 III 标准比较的自报肠易激综合征患者的流行病学、临床和心理学特征。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;18(2):392-398.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria.肠易激综合征的分型:从最初的罗马标准到罗马II标准
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):122-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04024.x.
8
[Irritable bowel syndrome in the Russian Federation: results of the ROMERUS multicenter observational study].[俄罗斯联邦的肠易激综合征:ROMERUS多中心观察性研究结果]
Ter Arkh. 2023 Feb 24;95(1):38-51. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2023.01.202043.
9
Are bowel symptoms and psychosocial features different in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal discomfort compared to abdominal pain?肠症状和社会心理特征在伴有腹部不适的肠易激综合征患者中与腹痛患者有何不同?
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 7;28(33):4861-4874. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4861.
10
The epidemiology and quality of life of functional gastrointestinal disorders according to Rome III vs Rome IV criteria: A cross-sectional study in primary care.根据罗马 III 与罗马 IV 标准,功能性胃肠疾病的流行病学和生活质量:初级保健中的横断面研究。
J Dig Dis. 2021 Mar;22(3):159-166. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12975.

引用本文的文献

1
The road to Rome IV and beyond: Evolution, refinements and future considerations for the Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.《罗马IV及未来:功能性胃肠病罗马标准的演变、完善与未来考量》
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 4. doi: 10.1007/s12664-025-01808-1.
2
Epidemiology of Disorders of the Gut-Brain Interaction: An Appraisal of the Rome IV Criteria and Beyond.肠脑互动障碍的流行病学:对罗马 IV 标准及其他标准的评估。
Gut Liver. 2024 Jul 15;18(4):578-592. doi: 10.5009/gnl230396. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Cognition of abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort in Chinese patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.
中国腹泻型肠易激综合征患者对腹痛和腹部不适的认知
Biopsychosoc Med. 2023 Sep 8;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13030-023-00286-1.
4
Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Japan, China, and South Korea: An International Cross-sectional Study.日本、中国和韩国肠易激综合征的患病率:一项国际横断面研究。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Apr 30;29(2):229-237. doi: 10.5056/jnm22037.
5
Are bowel symptoms and psychosocial features different in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal discomfort compared to abdominal pain?肠症状和社会心理特征在伴有腹部不适的肠易激综合征患者中与腹痛患者有何不同?
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 7;28(33):4861-4874. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4861.