Wang Bin, Zhao Wei, Zhao Chunshan, Jin Hong, Zhang Lili, Chen Qiuyu, Wang Bangmao
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;54(12):1433-1440. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1698650. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
The Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal diseases (FGIDs) have been updated from Rome III to Rome IV. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the update on patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in China. A previous database including consecutive patients with FGIDs (according to Rome III criteria) from gastrointestinal department of a tertiary hospital in China was re-analyzed. Demographic information, clinical symptoms, psychological status (Zung self-rating scale), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) were compared between patients with Rome III and Rome IV IBS. Of the 946 patients with FGIDs, only 58 (6.1%) were diagnosed with Rome IV IBS [less than 292 (30.9%) under Rome III criteria] with a surge of the number of unspecified functional bowel disorders (U-FBD). All patients with IBS were divided into three groups: group A [meeting both Rome III and IV criteria, accounting for 43 (4.6%) of patients with FGIDs], group B [meeting only Rome III criteria, 249 (26.3%)], and group C [meeting only Rome IV criteria,15 (1.6%)]. Significant differences in frequency and severity of symptoms, subtypes, and sleep quality among groups (all < .05) were found. Patients with Rome III IBS having sleep disorder tended to be more serious than those without. On the contrary, it was not the case under Rome IV criteria. Number of IBS patients was greatly reduced accompanied by a surge in U-FBD. Besides, the updated criteria also had great impacts on clinical parameters, sleep quality and psychological state of IBS patients.HighlightsRome IV criteria removed the description of abdominal discomfort for IBS.The updated Rome criteria had great impacts on IBS patients in our database.Our study analyzed the characteristics of IBS patients who fulfilled both criteria.Alterations in the Rome criteria also led to changes in the disease spectrum of FBD.
功能性胃肠病(FGIDs)的罗马标准已从罗马Ⅲ更新至罗马Ⅳ。本研究旨在探讨该更新对中国肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的影响。对来自中国一家三级医院消化内科的既往数据库(包含根据罗马Ⅲ标准连续纳入的FGIDs患者)进行重新分析。比较了罗马Ⅲ型和罗马Ⅳ型IBS患者的人口统计学信息、临床症状、心理状态(zung自评量表)和睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)。在946例FGIDs患者中,仅58例(6.1%)被诊断为罗马Ⅳ型IBS[低于罗马Ⅲ标准下的292例(30.9%)],未特定的功能性肠病(U-FBD)数量激增。所有IBS患者分为三组:A组[同时符合罗马Ⅲ和Ⅳ标准,占FGIDs患者的43例(4.6%)]、B组[仅符合罗马Ⅲ标准,249例(26.3%)]和C组[仅符合罗马Ⅳ标准,15例(1.6%)]。发现各组在症状频率和严重程度、亚型及睡眠质量方面存在显著差异(均P<0.05)。有睡眠障碍的罗马Ⅲ型IBS患者往往比无睡眠障碍者更严重。相反,在罗马Ⅳ标准下情况并非如此。IBS患者数量大幅减少,同时U-FBD数量激增。此外,更新后的标准对IBS患者的临床参数、睡眠质量和心理状态也有很大影响。
要点
罗马Ⅳ标准删除了IBS腹部不适的描述。
更新后的罗马标准对我们数据库中的IBS患者有很大影响。
我们的研究分析了符合两种标准的IBS患者的特征。
罗马标准的改变也导致了FBD疾病谱的变化。