Greenman J, Duffield J, Spencer P, Rosenberg M, Corry D, Saad S, Lenton P, Majerus G, Nachnani S, El-Maaytah M
Centre for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
J Dent Res. 2004 Jan;83(1):81-5. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300116.
The 0-5 organoleptic scale is used widely in breath research and in trials to measure the efficacy of anti-odor agents. However, the precise relationship between odor scores and gas concentrations of target odorants is unknown. The purpose of this study was to relate mean organoleptic scores from odor judges (n = 7) for pure odorants (n = 8) representative of those found in oral malodor. Judges used a common 0-5 scale to report the odor intensity of sample sets in random order of concentration. Regression analysis of data showed that odor score was proportional to the log concentration of odorant, and comparison of slopes showed H(2)S to be the most significant in terms of odor power. Detection thresholds (mol.dm(-3)) were: Skatole (7.2 x 10(-13)) < methylmercaptan (1.0 x 10(-11)) < trimethylamine (1.8 x 10(-11)) < isovalerate (1.8 x 10(-11)) < butyrate (2.3 x 10(-10)) < hydrogen sulphide (6.4 x 10(-10)) < putrescine (9.1 x 10(-10)) < dimethyl disulphide (5.9 x 10(-8)). The study demonstrates the exponential nature of the olfactory response and shows that any single compound's contribution to malodor depends on odor power and threshold in addition to concentration.
0-5感官评分量表在呼吸研究和测量除臭剂功效的试验中被广泛使用。然而,气味评分与目标气味剂气体浓度之间的确切关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是将来自气味评判员(n = 7)对代表口腔异味中发现的纯气味剂(n = 8)的平均感官评分联系起来。评判员使用常见的0-5量表,按照浓度的随机顺序报告样本集的气味强度。对数据的回归分析表明,气味评分与气味剂的对数浓度成正比,斜率比较表明,就气味强度而言,硫化氢最为显著。检测阈值(mol·dm⁻³)为:粪臭素(7.2×10⁻¹³)<甲硫醇(1.0×10⁻¹¹)<三甲胺(1.8×10⁻¹¹)<异戊酸(1.8×10⁻¹¹)<丁酸(2.3×10⁻¹⁰)<硫化氢(6.4×10⁻¹⁰)<腐胺(9.1×10⁻¹⁰)<二甲基二硫(5.9×10⁻⁸)。该研究证明了嗅觉反应的指数性质,并表明任何单一化合物对异味的贡献除了取决于浓度外,还取决于气味强度和阈值。