Suppr超能文献

旋磨术与球囊血管成形术治疗弥漫性支架内再狭窄的随机试验(ROSTER)

Randomized trial of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-stent Restenosis (ROSTER).

作者信息

Sharma Samin K, Kini Annapoorna, Mehran Roxana, Lansky Alexandra, Kobayashi Yoshio, Marmur Jonathan D

机构信息

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2004 Jan;147(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various autopsy and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have shown neointimal proliferation as the main mechanism of in-stent restenosis (ISR) responsible for >95% of luminal narrowing while stent struts are not compressed. ISR of diffuse type has a high incidence of recurrence (up to 70%) after balloon angioplasty (PTCA). Tissue ablation with percutaneous rotational coronary atherectomy (PRCA) may be more efficacious compared to tissue compression or extrusion after PTCA for the interventional treatment of diffuse ISR.

METHODS

The Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis (ROSTER) trial is a single-center, randomized trial comparing PRCA to PTCA (both with IVUS guidance) in the treatment of diffuse ISR in 200 patients. In the PRCA group (n = 100), rotablation was performed using a burr-to-artery ratio >0.7 followed by adjunctive balloon dilatation at low pressure (4-6 atm). In the PTCA group (n = 100), high-pressure (>12 atm) balloon dilatation was performed using an optimal size balloon. The study's primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months and secondary end points included clinical events at 1 year and angiographic restenosis in a substudy of the last 75 patients enrolled.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were comparable between the 2 groups with similar procedural and angiographic success, but a higher rate of repeat stenting occurred in the PTCA group (31% vs 10%; P <.001). Although the angiographic acute luminal gain was similar between the 2 groups, IVUS analysis revealed lower residual intimal hyperplasia area after PRCA versus PTCA (2.1 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs. 3.3 +/- 1.8 mm2; P =.005). At a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 2 months, there were 2 deaths, 3 myocardial infarctions, and 3 coronary artery bypass graft procedures in each group. TLR incidence was 32% in the PRCA group and 45% in the PTCA group (P =.042), with a similar trend noted in the angiographic substudy.

CONCLUSION

The ROSTER trial for diffuse ISR revealed both PRCA and PTCA to be safe and effective, but PRCA resulted in less residual intimal hyperplasia, lower repeat stent use, and decreased TLR.

摘要

背景

多项尸检和血管内超声(IVUS)研究表明,新生内膜增生是支架内再狭窄(ISR)的主要机制,在支架小梁未受压的情况下,其导致管腔狭窄的比例超过95%。弥漫型ISR在球囊血管成形术(PTCA)后复发率很高(高达70%)。对于弥漫型ISR的介入治疗,与PTCA后的组织压缩或挤压相比,经皮冠状动脉旋磨术(PRCA)进行组织消融可能更有效。

方法

弥漫性支架内再狭窄的旋磨术与球囊血管成形术(ROSTER)试验是一项单中心随机试验,在200例患者中比较PRCA与PTCA(均在IVUS引导下)治疗弥漫型ISR的效果。在PRCA组(n = 100)中,使用磨头与动脉比率>0.7进行旋磨,随后在低压(4 - 6个大气压)下进行辅助球囊扩张。在PTCA组(n = 100)中,使用最佳尺寸的球囊进行高压(>12个大气压)球囊扩张。该研究的主要终点是9个月时的靶病变血运重建(TLR),次要终点包括1年时的临床事件以及在最后入组的75例患者的亚研究中的血管造影再狭窄情况。

结果

两组之间的基线临床和血管造影变量具有可比性,手术和血管造影成功率相似,但PTCA组重复置入支架的发生率更高(31%对10%;P <.001)。虽然两组之间血管造影的急性管腔增益相似,但IVUS分析显示,与PTCA相比,PRCA后残余内膜增生面积更小(2.1±0.9 mm²对3.3±1.8 mm²;P =.005)。在平均12±2个月的随访中,每组均有2例死亡、3例心肌梗死和3例冠状动脉旁路移植手术。PRCA组的TLR发生率为32%,PTCA组为45%(P =.042),在血管造影亚研究中也观察到类似趋势。

结论

ROSTER试验针对弥漫型ISR显示,PRCA和PTCA均安全有效,但PRCA导致的残余内膜增生更少、重复使用支架的情况更少且TLR降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验