Suppr超能文献

糖尿病性多发性神经病中的感觉测试与神经传导速度

Sensory testing versus nerve conduction velocity in diabetic polyneuropathy.

作者信息

Redmond J M, McKenna M J, Feingold M, Ahmad B K

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 1992 Dec;15(12):1334-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.880151207.

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the utility of quantitative sensory testing (QST) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) studies as measures of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP). We studied 36 diabetic patients divided into four clinical categories of increasing severity. QST included thermal testing and vibration thresholds. NCV studies included median, peroneal, and sural nerves. Results of QST and NCV were compared among clinical groups using survival methodology. The log-rank statistic showed significant differences among the groups; the direction of the differences were consonant with clinical severity. For each diabetic patient, the result of each measurement was classified as normal or abnormal; more diabetic patients had abnormal NCV than either vibration tests or thermal tests. In conclusion, findings of QST and NCV are in keeping with clinical categorization of patients, QST and NCV are complementary tests, and the sural sensory study is the best single predictor of DSP.

摘要

我们试图评估定量感觉测试(QST)和神经传导速度(NCV)研究作为远端对称性多发性神经病(DSP)测量方法的效用。我们研究了36例糖尿病患者,将其分为病情严重程度递增的四个临床类别。QST包括热觉测试和振动觉阈值测试。NCV研究包括正中神经、腓总神经和腓肠神经。使用生存分析方法比较了各临床组之间QST和NCV的结果。对数秩统计显示各组之间存在显著差异;差异方向与临床严重程度一致。对于每位糖尿病患者,每项测量结果分为正常或异常;NCV异常的糖尿病患者比振动觉测试或热觉测试异常的患者更多。总之,QST和NCV的结果与患者的临床分类相符,QST和NCV是互补性测试,腓肠感觉神经研究是DSP的最佳单一预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验