Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者振动觉定量感觉测试与神经传导研究的相关性

Correlation of vibratory quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction studies in patients with diabetes.

作者信息

Kincaid John C, Price Karen L, Jimenez Maria C, Skljarevski Vladimir

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2007 Dec;36(6):821-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.20880.

Abstract

Monitoring the course of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) remains a challenge. Besides clinical examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS) and quantitative sensory testing (QST) are the most commonly used methods for evaluating peripheral nerve function in clinical trials and population studies. In this study the correlation between vibratory QST and NCS was determined. Patients (N = 227) with diabetes mellitus participated in this multicenter, single-visit, cross-sectional study. QST of vibration measured with the CASE IV system was compared with a composite score of peroneal motor and tibial motor NCS and with individual attributes of peroneal, tibial, and sural nerves. The correlation between QST and composite score of NCS was 0.234 (Pearson correlation coefficient, P = 0.001). The correlations between QST and individual attributes of NCS ranged from 0.189 to 0.480 (Pearson correlation coefficients, P < 0.001). The low to moderate correlation between QST and NCS suggests that these tests cannot replace each other but are complementary.

摘要

监测糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的病程仍然是一项挑战。除了临床检查外,神经传导研究(NCS)和定量感觉测试(QST)是临床试验和人群研究中评估周围神经功能最常用的方法。在本研究中,确定了振动觉QST与NCS之间的相关性。患有糖尿病的患者(N = 227)参与了这项多中心、单次就诊的横断面研究。将使用CASE IV系统测量的振动觉QST与腓总运动神经和胫运动神经NCS的综合评分以及腓总神经、胫神经和腓肠神经的个体属性进行了比较。QST与NCS综合评分之间的相关性为0.234(Pearson相关系数,P = 0.001)。QST与NCS个体属性之间的相关性范围为0.189至0.480(Pearson相关系数,P < 0.001)。QST与NCS之间低至中度的相关性表明,这些测试不能相互替代,而是互补的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验