Shah Chirag, Kollef Marin H
Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):120-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104205.96219.D6.
To measure endotracheal tube intraluminal volume loss among mechanically ventilated patients.
Prospective observational study.
Medical intensive care unit (19 beds) of an urban university-affiliated teaching hospital.
A total of 101 patients with acute respiratory failure requiring >24 hrs of mechanical ventilation.
None.
Acoustic reflectometry was employed to measure the intraluminal volume of 13-cm endotracheal tube segments. The endotracheal tube segment volumes were statistically smaller among endotracheal tubes used in patients compared with unused endotracheal tubes (5.4 +/- 0.7 vs. 6.0 +/- 0.6 mL, p <.001). The average percentage difference in endotracheal tube segment volumes, between the unused endotracheal tubes and the endotracheal tubes used in patients, was 9.8% (range, 0-45.5%). The percentage difference in the endotracheal tube segment volumes increased significantly with increasing duration of tracheal intubation (r2 =.766, p <.001). The minimum diameter of the endotracheal tube segments was also statistically smaller among endotracheal tubes used in patients compared with the unused endotracheal tubes (7.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.2 mm, p <.001).
Endotracheal tube intraluminal volume loss is common among patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and increases with prolonged tracheal intubation.
测量机械通气患者气管内导管管腔容积损失。
前瞻性观察研究。
一所城市大学附属医院的医学重症监护病房(19张床位)。
总共101例急性呼吸衰竭且需要机械通气超过24小时的患者。
无。
采用声学反射法测量13厘米长气管内导管节段的管腔容积。与未使用的气管内导管相比,患者使用的气管内导管节段容积在统计学上更小(5.4±0.7 vs. 6.0±0.6毫升,p<.001)。未使用的气管内导管与患者使用的气管内导管之间,气管内导管节段容积的平均百分比差异为9.8%(范围为0 - 45.5%)。气管内导管节段容积的百分比差异随气管插管时间的延长而显著增加(r2 =.766,p<.001)。与未使用的气管内导管相比,患者使用的气管内导管节段的最小直径在统计学上也更小(7.5±0.4 vs. 6.7±1.2毫米,p<.001)。
气管内导管管腔容积损失在需要机械通气的急性呼吸衰竭患者中很常见,并随气管插管时间延长而增加。