Suppr超能文献

[机械通气患者气管内套囊充气不足的危险因素分析]

[Analysis on risk factors of endotracheal cuff under inflation in mechanically ventilated patients].

作者信息

Fu You, Xi Xiuming

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fuxing Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China, Corresponding author: Xi Xiuming, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Dec;26(12):870-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.12.005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalent condition of endotracheal cuff pressure and risk factors for under inflation.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Fuxing Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, who were intubated with a high-volume low-pressure endotracheal tube, and had undergone mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours, were enrolled. The endotracheal cuff pressure was determined every 8 hours by a manual manometer connected to the distal edge of the valve cuff at 07 : 00, 15 : 00, and 23 : 00. Measurement of the endotracheal cuff pressure was continued until the extubation of endotracheal or tracheostomy tube, or death of the patient. According to the incidence of under inflation of endotracheal cuff, patients were divided into the incidence of under inflation lower than 25% group (lower low cuff pressure group) and higher than 25% group (higher low cuff pressure group). The possible influencing factors were evaluated in the two groups, including body mass index (BMI), size of endotracheal tube, duration of intubation, use of sedative or analgesic, number of leaving from intensive care unit (ICU), the number of turning over the patients, and aspiration of sputum. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for under-inflation of the endotracheal cuff.

RESULTS

During the study period, 53 patients were enrolled. There were 812 measurements, and 46.3% of them was abnormal, and 204 times (25.1%) of under inflation of endotracheal cuff were found. There were 24 patients (45.3%) in whom the incidence of under inflation rate was higher than 25%. The average of under inflation was 7 (4, 10) times. Compared with the group with lower rate of low cuff pressure, a longer time for intubation was found in group with higher rate of low cuff pressure [hours: 162 (113, 225) vs. 118 (97, 168), Z=-2.034, P=0.042]. There were no differences between the two groups in other factors, including size of endotracheal tube, the time from intubation to first measurement of endotracheal cuff pressure, number of leaving from ICU during admission, use of sedative agent or analgesic, and the number of body turning and aspiration (all P>0.05). No risk factor was found resulting from under inflation of the endotracheal cuff by logistic regression analysis. No significant difference was found in the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, successful rate of weaning on 28th day, or 28-day mortality after weaning from mechanical ventilation, and ICU mortality between the two groups. However, patients in the group of higher rate of low cuff pressure had a longer ICU stay compared with that in the group of lower rate of low cuff pressure group [days: 13 (8, 21) vs. 10 (6, 18), Z=-2.120, P=0.034].

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal endotracheal cuff pressure is common in critically ill patients with intratracheal intubation. Duration of intubation is associated with under inflation of the cuff, and it calls for strengthening monitoring and management.

摘要

目的

探讨气管内套管压力的普遍情况及充气不足的危险因素。

方法

进行一项前瞻性队列研究。纳入首都医科大学附属复兴医院重症医学科收治的、使用大容量低压气管内导管进行气管插管且机械通气至少48小时的患者。于07:00、15:00和23:00使用连接至瓣膜套远端边缘的手动压力计每8小时测定一次气管内套管压力。持续测量气管内套管压力直至气管内或气管造口管拔除或患者死亡。根据气管内套管充气不足的发生率,将患者分为充气不足发生率低于25%组(低套管压力较低组)和高于25%组(低套管压力较高组)。评估两组中可能的影响因素,包括体重指数(BMI)、气管内导管尺寸、插管持续时间、镇静或镇痛药物的使用、离开重症监护病房(ICU)的次数、患者翻身次数及吸痰情况。采用Logistic回归分析确定气管内套管充气不足的危险因素。

结果

研究期间,共纳入53例患者。进行了812次测量,其中46.3%异常,发现气管内套管充气不足204次(25.1%)。有24例患者(45.3%)充气不足发生率高于25%。充气不足的平均次数为7(4, 10)次。与低套管压力发生率较低的组相比,低套管压力发生率较高的组插管时间更长[小时:162(113, 225) vs. 118(97, 168),Z = -2.034,P = 0.042]。两组在其他因素方面无差异,包括气管内导管尺寸、从插管到首次测量气管内套管压力的时间、住院期间离开ICU的次数、镇静剂或镇痛药物的使用以及身体翻身和吸痰次数(所有P>0.05)。Logistic回归分析未发现气管内套管充气不足导致的危险因素。两组在呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率、机械通气持续时间、第28天脱机成功率、机械通气脱机后28天死亡率以及ICU死亡率方面无显著差异。然而,低套管压力发生率较高组的患者在ICU的住院时间比低套管压力发生率较低组更长[天:13(8, 21) vs. 10(6, 18),Z = -2.120,P = 0.034]。

结论

气管插管的重症患者中气管内套管压力异常常见。插管持续时间与套管充气不足有关,需要加强监测和管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验