• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生对参与研究的看法。

Clinician perspectives on participation in research.

作者信息

Albers Leah L, Sedler Kay D

机构信息

University of New Mexico College of Nursing, Albuquerque 87131-5688, USA.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.09.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.09.013
PMID:14710140
Abstract

Midwifery practice settings offer ideal opportunities to conduct research on normal childbearing. Increasing the output of midwifery research would benefit midwives, as well as the women they serve. But finding ways to add research activities to a busy clinical schedule is a challenge. Factors thought to promote clinician participation in research are as follows: perceived relevance of the research topic, a relationship with a lead researcher, regular feedback to clinicians, minimal impact of a study on usual clinical care, and some level of compensation for clinicians who participate in research. Barriers include time constraints, lack of research updates and support, and limited research skills of clinicians. Joint projects by academic researchers teamed with active clinician groups are suggested as one way to move a midwifery research agenda forward.

摘要

助产实践环境为开展正常分娩研究提供了理想机会。增加助产研究成果将使助产士及其服务的女性受益。但要找到在繁忙的临床日程中增加研究活动的方法是一项挑战。被认为可促进临床医生参与研究的因素如下:研究主题的感知相关性、与首席研究员的关系、定期向临床医生反馈、研究对常规临床护理的最小影响,以及对参与研究的临床医生给予一定程度的补偿。障碍包括时间限制、缺乏研究更新和支持,以及临床医生研究技能有限。建议学术研究人员与活跃的临床医生团队开展联合项目,以此推动助产研究议程向前发展。

相似文献

1
Clinician perspectives on participation in research.临床医生对参与研究的看法。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.09.013.
2
Health care managers' perspectives on new nursing and midwifery roles: perceived impact on patient care and cost effectiveness.医疗保健管理人员对新的护理和助产士角色的看法:对患者护理和成本效益的感知影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):627-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00948.x.
3
Voices of diversity in midwifery: a qualitative research study.助产领域的多元声音:一项定性研究
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;51(2):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.07.007.
4
The researcher development program: how to extend the involvement of Australian general practitioners in research?研究人员发展计划:如何扩大澳大利亚全科医生参与研究的程度?
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):776. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
5
Priorities for midwifery research in Perth, Western Australia: a Delphi study.西澳大利亚州珀斯市助产士研究的优先事项:一项德尔菲研究
Int J Nurs Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):78-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00554.x.
6
An exploration of midwives' attitudes to research and perceived barriers to research utilisation.助产士对研究的态度及研究应用中感知到的障碍探索。
Midwifery. 1996 Jun;12(2):73-84. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(96)90004-2.
7
A profile of Colorado nurse--midwives: implications for health care.科罗拉多州助产护士概况:对医疗保健的启示
West J Nurs Res. 2009 Feb;31(1):24-43. doi: 10.1177/0193945908319989. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
8
An evaluation of fitness for practice curricula: self-efficacy, support and self-reported competence in preregistration student nurses and midwives.对实践能力课程的评估:预注册护士和助产士学生的自我效能感、支持与自我报告的能力
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(14):1858-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02223.x.
9
An investigation of nurse educator's perceptions and experiences of undertaking clinical practice.一项关于护士教育工作者对临床实践的认知与经历的调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Nov;28(8):899-908. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
10
The landscape of caring for women: a narrative study of midwifery practice.关爱女性的图景:一项关于助产实践的叙事研究
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.09.015.

引用本文的文献

1
A feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial protocol to assess the impact of an eHealth intervention on the provision of dietary advice in primary care.一项随机对照试验方案的可行性研究,旨在评估电子健康干预对初级保健中饮食建议提供情况的影响。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 14;8(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01168-z.
2
Patient and physician perspectives on engaging in palliative and healthcare trials: a qualitative descriptive study.患者和医生对参与姑息治疗和医疗试验的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 14;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00856-6.
3
Music Therapist Experiences of a Randomized Controlled Trial as Clinician Researchers.
音乐治疗师作为临床研究人员参与随机对照试验的体验。
J Music Ther. 2020 Jul 18;57(3):315-352. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thaa005.
4
Understanding practice-based research participation: The differing motivations of engaged vs. non-engaged clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.理解基于实践的研究参与:务实临床试验中参与和未参与的临床医生的不同动机。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Aug 23;4:136-140. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Dec 15.
5
Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches.医生参与临床研究与试验:问题与方法
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Mar 7;2:85-93. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S14103. Print 2011.
6
Science, technology, and innovation: nursing responsibilities in clinical research.科学、技术与创新:临床研究中的护理职责
Nurs Clin North Am. 2009 Dec;44(4):471-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.011.