Bagner Daniel M, Eyberg Sheila M
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, P.O. Box 100165, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0165, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Dec;32(4):599-605. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_13.
We examined the impact of father involvement on treatment. Participants were 107 families enrolled in parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT), including 56 involved-father (IF) families, 16 uninvolved-father (UF) families, and 35 absent-father (AF) families. All groups showed improvements during treatment to within the average range on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), although mothers from AF families reported better treatment outcome than mothers from IF families. Improvements occurred on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) as well, but there were no group differences. At a 4-month follow-up, mothers in IF families maintained treatment gains on the ECBI. In contrast, mothers in AF families reported significant decline at follow-up, although their scores remained within the normal range. Results suggest that father participation in treatment may not affect immediate treatment outcome but may help to maintain the beneficial effects of PCIT.
我们研究了父亲参与对治疗的影响。参与者为107个参与亲子互动治疗(PCIT)的家庭,其中包括56个父亲参与(IF)家庭、16个父亲未参与(UF)家庭和35个父亲缺失(AF)家庭。所有组在治疗期间艾伯格儿童行为量表(ECBI)得分均改善至平均范围以内,不过AF家庭的母亲报告的治疗效果比IF家庭的母亲更好。贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和育儿压力指数(PSI)得分也有改善,但组间无差异。在4个月的随访中,IF家庭的母亲在ECBI上维持了治疗效果。相比之下,AF家庭的母亲在随访时报告得分显著下降,尽管她们的分数仍在正常范围内。结果表明,父亲参与治疗可能不会影响即时治疗效果,但可能有助于维持PCIT的有益效果。