Whitacre Keri Bailey, Foley Kimberly, Jackson Carrie, Curtis Reagan, McNeil Cheryl B
Department of Psychology, West Virginia University-Potomac State College, Keyser, West Virginia, USA.
Children's Medical Group, Cumberland, Maryland, USA.
Child Fam Behav Ther. 2020;42(3):169-185. doi: 10.1080/07317107.2020.1782005. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
This study compared Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in a group format to a Treatment as Usual (TAU) group format within a community setting. PCIT is typically conducted individually with caregiver and child in a clinical setting. Results showed decreases on the Parenting Stress Index (PSI-SF), for both treatment groups over time with the PCIT group reporting less parental stress than the TAU group. However, there was no difference between groups over time on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI). This study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of delivering PCIT in a community setting. The implication for child welfare clinicians is that an evidence-based program such as PCIT, can serve more caregivers and children and decrease parents' stress.
本研究在社区环境中,将团体形式的亲子互动疗法(PCIT)与常规治疗(TAU)团体形式进行了比较。PCIT通常在临床环境中由照顾者和孩子单独进行。结果显示,随着时间的推移,两个治疗组的育儿压力指数(PSI-SF)均有所下降,其中PCIT组报告的父母压力低于TAU组。然而,随着时间的推移,两组在虐待儿童潜在性量表(CAPI)上没有差异。本研究为在社区环境中实施PCIT的疗效提供了初步证据。对儿童福利临床医生的启示是,像PCIT这样的循证项目可以为更多的照顾者和孩子服务,并减轻父母的压力。