Jesús de la Calle Iría, Jesús de la Calle María Antonia, Rodríguez-Iglesias Manuel
Laboratory of Microbiology, Puerto Real University Hospital, University of Cádiz, Cadiz, Spain.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Dec;47(4):573-8. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00163-9.
We evaluated the BDProbeTec ET System (Becton Dickinson) for the routine detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) in respiratory specimens and pleural fluids, comparing with microscopy (Ziehl Neelsen stain, ZN) and culture in liquid (BACTEC MGIT 960, MGIT) and solid (Löwenstein Jensen, LJ) media. Five hundred and two specimens, collected from 266 patients, of which 257 with suspected tuberculosis and 9 receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment, were investigated. Thirty-nine specimens were positive by any method, including false positives. Mycobacteria were isolated from 33 specimens (32 Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 1 Mycobacterium chelonae). Thirty-six specimens were BDProbeTec ET positive, 33 specimens were MGIT positive, 27 were LJ positive and 22 were ZN positive. With BDProbeTec ET, 2 specimens were false negative (culture positive), and 2 specimens from non-treated patients were false positive (culture negative). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for BDProbeTec ET compared to culture were 93.7, 98.7, 83.3, and 99.5%, respectively, while with smear-positive and smear-negative specimens the sensitivities were 100% and 81.5% respectively. In five treated patients the disappearance of MTC could be monitored using BDProbeTec ET in parallel with culture. The overall inhibition rate was 0.2%. BDProbeTec ET can be very useful for rapid detection of MTC, especially in smear-negative respiratory specimens.
我们评估了BDProbeTec ET系统(BD公司)用于呼吸道标本和胸水结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTC)的常规检测,并与显微镜检查(萋-尼氏染色,ZN)以及液体(BACTEC MGIT 960,MGIT)和固体(罗-琴培养基,LJ)培养基培养法进行比较。对从266例患者采集的502份标本进行了研究,其中257例疑似结核病患者,9例正在接受抗结核治疗。通过任何方法检测出39份标本呈阳性,包括假阳性。从33份标本中分离出分枝杆菌(32株结核分枝杆菌和1株龟分枝杆菌)。36份标本BDProbeTec ET检测呈阳性,33份标本MGIT检测呈阳性,27份标本LJ检测呈阳性,22份标本ZN检测呈阳性。使用BDProbeTec ET检测时,2份标本为假阴性(培养阳性),2份未治疗患者的标本为假阳性(培养阴性)。与培养法相比,BDProbeTec ET的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为93.7%、98.7%、83.3%和99.5%,而涂片阳性和涂片阴性标本的敏感性分别为100%和81.5%。在5例接受治疗的患者中,可以使用BDProbeTec ET与培养法同时监测MTC的消失情况。总体抑制率为0.2%。BDProbeTec ET对于快速检测MTC非常有用,尤其是在涂片阴性的呼吸道标本中。