Frantík E, Horváth M
National Institute of Public Health, Centre of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
Toxicol Lett. 1992 Dec;64-65 Spec No:225-9. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(92)90193-n.
The validity of behavioral and neurophysiological models can only be assessed with respect to the type of the modelled effect: for acute changes in activation level as well as for chronic motor or sensory deficits both approaches are equally prone to misinterpretation. Validation of behavioral criteria supported by neurophysiological correlates and vice versa is the best protection. In the cognitive and emotional sphere, a shift to testing of the readiness ("fluidity") dimension seems to be promising both in human and animal studies, permitting also more reliable extrapolations and efficient cooperation of behavioral and neurophysiological approaches.
对于激活水平的急性变化以及慢性运动或感觉缺陷,这两种方法同样容易产生误解。由神经生理关联支持的行为标准的验证,反之亦然,是最好的保障。在认知和情感领域,转向对准备状态(“流畅性”)维度的测试在人类和动物研究中似乎都很有前景,这也使得行为和神经生理方法能够进行更可靠的推断和高效的合作。