Suppr超能文献

在腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗完全性直肠脱垂中保留直肠上动脉。

Preserving the superior rectal artery in laparoscopic sigmoid resection for complete rectal prolapse.

作者信息

Bergamaschi Roberto, Lovvik Kari, Marvik Ronald

机构信息

National Center for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003 Dec;13(6):374-6. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200312000-00005.

Abstract

Sigmoid resection is indicated in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) in patients with prolonged colorectal transit time (CTT). Its use, however, has been limited because of fear of anastomotic leakage. This study challenges the current practice of dividing the mesorectum by prospectively evaluating the impact of sparing the superior rectal artery (SRA) on leak rates after laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) for CRP. During a 30-month period, data on 33 selected patients with CRP were prospectively collected. Three patients were withdrawn from the analysis, as they had neither resection nor anastomosis. Twenty-nine women and 1 man (median age 55 range 21-83 years) underwent LSR with preservation of SRA for a median CRP of 8 (3-15) cm. There were 20 ASA I and 10 ASA II patients. Ten patients had undergone previous surgery. Four patients complained of dyschezia, whereas incontinence was present in 26 patients. Anal ultrasound showed isolated internal sphincter defects in 2 patients. Four young adults (21-32 years) had normal CTT, whereas 26 older patients had a median CTT of 5(4-6) days. Defecography demonstrated 10 enteroceles, two sigmoidoceles, and one rectal hernia through the levator ani muscle. Mortality was nil. Median operating room time was 180 (120-330) min, suprapubic incision length 5(3-7) cm, estimated blood loss 150 (50-500) mL, specimen length 20 (12-45) cm, solid food resumption 3(1-6) days, and length of stay 4.5(2-7) days. Thirty-day complications were not related to anastomosing and occurred in 20% of the patients. Median follow-up was 34.1 (18-48) months. One patient had a recurrence. Although the evidence provided by the present study suggests that sparing SRA has a favorable impact on anastomotic leak rates, these nonrandomized results need further evaluation. The division of the mesorectum at the rectosigmoid junction seems not necessary, and its sparing should therefore be considered as it may contain anastomotic leak rates.

摘要

对于大肠传输时间(CTT)延长的完全性直肠脱垂(CRP)患者,乙状结肠切除术是一种治疗选择。然而,由于担心吻合口漏,其应用受到限制。本研究通过前瞻性评估保留直肠上动脉(SRA)对CRP患者腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术(LSR)后漏率的影响,对目前直肠系膜的分割方法提出了挑战。在30个月的时间里,前瞻性收集了33例选定的CRP患者的数据。3例患者因既未进行切除也未进行吻合而退出分析。29名女性和1名男性(中位年龄55岁,范围21 - 83岁)接受了保留SRA的LSR,CRP的中位长度为8(3 - 15)cm。有20例ASA I级和10例ASA II级患者。10例患者曾接受过手术。4例患者主诉排便困难,26例患者存在失禁。肛门超声显示2例患者存在孤立性内括约肌缺陷。4名年轻人(21 - 32岁)的CTT正常,而26名老年患者的CTT中位值为5(4 - 6)天。排粪造影显示10例直肠膨出、2例乙状结肠膨出和1例通过肛提肌的直肠疝。无死亡病例。中位手术时间为180(120 - 330)分钟,耻骨上切口长度为5(3 - 7)cm,估计失血量为150(50 - 500)mL,标本长度为20(12 - 45)cm,恢复固体食物时间为3(1 - 6)天,住院时间为4.5(2 - 7)天。30天并发症与吻合无关,20%的患者发生了并发症。中位随访时间为34.1(18 - 48)个月。1例患者复发。虽然本研究提供的证据表明保留SRA对吻合口漏率有有利影响,但这些非随机结果需要进一步评估。在直肠乙状结肠交界处分割直肠系膜似乎没有必要,因此应考虑保留它,因为这可能会降低吻合口漏率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验