Sohn Maximilian, Schlitt H J, Hornung M, Zülke C, Hochrein A, Moser C, Agha A
Department of General, Abdominal, Endocrine and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, Englschalkinger Strasse 77, 81925, Munich, Germany.
Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;32(7):955-960. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2792-x. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
To evaluate the impact of superior rectal artery (SRA) sparing technique on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
A retrospective multicenter analysis of all patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease between 2002 and 2015 was conducted. Data were recorded in three hospitals: University Hospital Regensburg, Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, and Städtisches Klinikum München Bogenhausen. The SRA was resected between 2002 and 2005. Since 2005, the artery was preserved in most cases.
Two hundred sixty-seven patients were included. One hundred sixty patients presented with complicated diverticulitis (60%). The SRA was resected in 102 patients (group 1) and preserved in 157 patients (group 2, no data in eight cases). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7% of patients in group 1 and 1.9% of patients in group 2 (p = 0.053). Duration of surgery was significantly shorter (157 vs. 183 min, p < 0.001) in group 2 patients. Length of hospital stay was without significant difference (group 1 8.2 days; group 2 8.3 days; p = 0.83). The conversion rate was higher in group 2 patients; however, the difference was not statistically significant (9 vs. 3%, p = 0.07). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding intraoperative complications and overall complication rate. The length of the resected specimen (19 vs. 21 cm, p = 0.001) was significantly shorter in group 2 patients.
Preservation of the SRA seems to be associated with favorable outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease.
评估保留直肠上动脉(SRA)技术对憩室病腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术吻合口漏的影响。
对2002年至2015年间所有接受腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的患者进行回顾性多中心分析。数据记录于三家医院:雷根斯堡大学医院、盖尔森基兴玛利亚医院和慕尼黑博根豪森市立医院。2002年至2005年间切除SRA。自2005年起,多数情况下保留该动脉。
纳入267例患者。160例患者表现为复杂性憩室炎(60%)。102例患者的SRA被切除(第1组),157例患者的SRA被保留(第2组,8例无数据)。第1组患者中7%发生吻合口漏,第2组患者中1.9%发生吻合口漏(p = 0.053)。第2组患者的手术时间显著更短(157 vs. 183分钟,p < 0.001)。住院时间无显著差异(第1组8.2天;第2组8.3天;p = 0.83)。第2组患者的中转率更高;然而,差异无统计学意义(9% vs. 3%,p = 0.07)。两组在术中并发症和总体并发症发生率方面无显著差异。第2组患者切除标本的长度显著更短(19 vs. 21厘米,p = 0.001)。
对于接受腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的患者,保留SRA似乎与良好的预后相关。