Seidman Joshua J, Steinwachs Donald, Rubin Haya R
Center for Information Therapy, Healthwise, Inc, 600 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Nov 27;5(4):e29. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e29.
Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality of information, rather than evaluating information accuracy and comprehensiveness.
This research sought to build a conceptual framework that could lay the groundwork for a robust performance-measurement system for evaluating the quality of Internet health information.
Application of the quality-of-care measurement paradigm to developing a conceptual framework for defining and evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites.
Performance measures related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of information can be added to structural criteria to provide a more-robust approach to Web site evaluation.
The development and implementation of a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites could provide lay people with a tool to identify useful content more easily and distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.
大多数现有的衡量互联网健康信息质量的工具几乎完全专注于结构标准或其他信息质量的替代指标，而非评估信息的准确性和全面性。
本研究旨在构建一个概念框架，为评估互联网健康信息质量的强大绩效测量系统奠定基础。
将医疗质量测量范式应用于为定义和评估糖尿病患者信息网站质量开发概念框架。
与信息准确性和全面性相关的绩效指标可以添加到结构标准中，以提供一种更强大的网站评估方法。
开发并实施一种可靠且有效的评估互联网健康网站质量的方法，可以为普通民众提供一种工具，使其更容易识别有用内容，并区分有益信息和误导性信息。
