• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于过程的医疗质量衡量指标的优缺点。

The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality.

作者信息

Rubin H R, Pronovost P, Diette G B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):469-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.469.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/13.6.469
PMID:11769749
Abstract

As consumers, payers, and regulatory agencies require evidence regarding health care qualities the demand for process of care measures will grow. Although outcome measures of quality represent the desired end results of health care, validated process of care measures provide an important additional element to quality improvement efforts, as they illuminate exactly which provider actions could be changed to improve patient outcomes. In this essay, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of process measures of quality, and outline some practical strategies and issues in implementing them.

摘要

随着消费者、支付方和监管机构要求提供有关医疗保健质量的证据,对医疗护理过程指标的需求将会增加。虽然质量结果指标代表了医疗保健期望的最终结果,但经过验证的医疗护理过程指标为质量改进工作提供了一个重要的额外要素,因为它们确切地阐明了哪些医疗服务提供者的行为可以改变以改善患者的治疗结果。在本文中,我们讨论了质量过程指标的优缺点,并概述了实施这些指标的一些实用策略和问题。

相似文献

1
The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality.基于过程的医疗质量衡量指标的优缺点。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):469-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.469.
2
Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care.医疗质量评估中的过程指标与结果指标
Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):475-80. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.475.
3
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
4
Developing and implementing measures of quality of care in the intensive care unit.制定并实施重症监护病房的护理质量衡量标准。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001 Aug;7(4):297-303. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200108000-00014.
5
From a process of care to a measure: the development and testing of a quality indicator.从护理过程到一项衡量标准:一项质量指标的开发与测试
Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):489-96. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.489.
6
Performance measures for pneumonia: are they valuable, and are process measures adequate?肺炎的绩效指标:它们有价值吗?过程指标足够吗?
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;20(2):182-9. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3280495468.
7
Defining high quality health care.定义高质量医疗保健。
Urol Oncol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.015.
8
Health care provider quality improvement organization Medicare data-sharing: a diabetes quality improvement initiative.医疗服务提供者质量改进组织医疗保险数据共享:一项糖尿病质量改进倡议。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:22-5.
9
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.评估为儿童提供的医疗保健质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
10
Measuring process of arthritis care: the Arthritis Foundation's quality indicator set for rheumatoid arthritis.关节炎护理的测量过程:关节炎基金会针对类风湿关节炎的质量指标集
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb;35(4):211-37. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.08.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Theory-informed refinement and tailored implementation of a quality improvement program in maternity care to reduce unwarranted clinical variation across a health service network.基于理论的产妇护理质量改进项目的优化与定制实施,以减少整个医疗服务网络中不必要的临床差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12267-x.
2
Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.制定评估“二次受害者”项目的核心指标:一种国际共识方法。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;69:1607428. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428. eCollection 2024.
3
Quality Indicators of Pediatric Asthma Care in the Emergency Department; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
急诊科小儿哮喘护理质量指标;系统评价与Meta分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 13;12(1):e26. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2214. eCollection 2024.
4
Intrapartum care measures and indicators for monitoring the implementation of WHO recommendations for a positive childbirth experience: a scoping review.产时护理措施和监测指标,以监测世卫组织关于积极分娩体验建议的执行情况:范围审查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 22;13(11):e069081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069081.
5
Protocol for developing a set of performance measures to monitor and evaluate delirium care quality for older adults in the emergency department using a modified e-Delphi process.制定一套使用改良电子德尔菲法监测和评估急诊科老年患者谵妄护理质量的绩效指标的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 22;13(8):e074730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074730.
6
Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan's Regional Health Care Plans.日本地区医疗保健计划中急诊医学政策与质量指标的横向调查。
JMA J. 2023 Jul 14;6(3):284-291. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2022-0172. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Patients' perspectives on the quality of care of a new complex psycho-oncological care programme in Germany - external mixed methods evaluation results.患者对德国新的复杂心理肿瘤护理计划的护理质量的看法 - 外部混合方法评估结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 15;23(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09714-y.
8
Structured Evaluation and Management of Patients with COPD in an Accredited Program.在一个认证项目中对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行结构化评估与管理。
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2023 Jul 26;10(3):297-307. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0366.
9
A Quality Framework to Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency Department Care.一个解决急诊部门医疗服务中种族和民族差异问题的质量框架。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;81(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
10
Healthcare Service Interventions to Improve the Healthcare Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients with Extreme Obesity: Protocol for an Evidence and Gap Map.改善极度肥胖住院患者医疗保健结局的医疗服务干预措施:证据与差距图方案
Methods Protoc. 2022 Jun 8;5(3):48. doi: 10.3390/mps5030048.