Lee W A
Programs in Physical Therapy, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Mot Behav. 1984 Jun;16(2):135-70. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1984.10735316.
Although neurally based units of action (neuromotor synergies) have often been proposed as a possible basis for coordinated intentional as well as automatic actions, the idea has rarely been translated into sets of testable hypotheses. This essay examines four issues which should facilitate the development of such hypotheses: (a) definitions of neuromotor synergies, (b) criteria for recognizing and comparing synergies in automatic and intentional actions, (c) problems in representing systems of synergies, and (d) models for generating intentional actions from sets of neuromotor synergies. Limitations of, and support for the neuromotor synergy hypothesis are discussed, both in general and for the specific cases of postural synergies and cervico-spinal reflexes. Although current data do not provide conclusive support for or against the neuromotor synergy hypothesis, the problem can be formulated in ways open to experimental investigation.
尽管基于神经的动作单元(神经运动协同)常被认为是协调的有意动作和自动动作的一种可能基础,但这一观点很少被转化为可检验的假设集。本文探讨了四个有助于此类假设发展的问题:(a)神经运动协同的定义,(b)识别和比较自动动作与有意动作中协同的标准,(c)表示协同系统的问题,以及(d)从神经运动协同集生成有意动作的模型。本文还讨论了神经运动协同假设的局限性和支持证据,包括总体情况以及姿势协同和颈脊髓反射的具体案例。尽管目前的数据并未为支持或反对神经运动协同假设提供确凿证据,但该问题可以以可供实验研究的方式来阐述。