Lutfi Robert A, Kistler Doris J, Callahan Michael R, Wightman Frederic L
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3273-82. doi: 10.1121/1.1629303.
The term informational masking has traditionally been used to refer to elevations in signal threshold resulting from masker uncertainty. In the present study, the method of constant stimuli was used to obtain complete psychometric functions (PFs) from 44 normal-hearing listeners in conditions known to produce varying amounts of informational masking. The listener's task was to detect a pure-tone signal in the presence of a broadband noise masker (low masker uncertainty) and in the presence of multitone maskers with frequencies and amplitudes that varied at random from one presentation to the next (high masker uncertainty). Relative to the broadband noise condition, significant reductions were observed in both the slope and the upper asymptote of the PF for multitone maskers producing large amounts of informational masking. Slope was affected more for some listeners and conditions while asymptote was affected more for others; consequently, neither parameter alone was highly predictive of individual thresholds or the amount of informational masking. Mean slopes and asymptotes varied nonmonotonically with the number of masker components in a manner similar to mean thresholds, particularly when the estimated effect of energetic masking on thresholds was subtracted out. As in past studies, the threshold data were well described by a model in which trial-by-trial judgments are based on a weighted sum of levels in dB at the output of independent auditory filters. The psychometric data, however, complicated the model's interpretation in two ways: First, they suggested that, depending on the listener and condition, the weights can either reflect a fixed influence of masker components on each trial or the effect of occasionally mistaking a masker component for the signal from trial to trial. Second, they indicated that in either case the variance of the underlying decision variable as estimated from PF slope is not by itself great enough to account for the observed changes in informational masking.
信息掩蔽这一术语传统上用于指因掩蔽声不确定性导致的信号阈值升高。在本研究中,采用恒定刺激法,从44名听力正常的被试者中获取在已知会产生不同程度信息掩蔽的条件下的完整心理测量函数(PFs)。被试者的任务是在存在宽带噪声掩蔽声(低掩蔽声不确定性)以及存在多音掩蔽声(其频率和幅度在每次呈现时随机变化,高掩蔽声不确定性)的情况下检测纯音信号。相对于宽带噪声条件,对于产生大量信息掩蔽的多音掩蔽声,PF的斜率和上渐近线均显著降低。对于一些被试者和条件,斜率受影响更大,而对于另一些被试者和条件,渐近线受影响更大;因此,单独的这两个参数都不能很好地预测个体阈值或信息掩蔽量。平均斜率和渐近线与掩蔽声声成分数量的变化呈非单调关系,方式类似于平均阈值,尤其是在减去能量掩蔽对阈值的估计影响之后。与以往研究一样,阈值数据可以通过一个模型很好地描述,在该模型中,逐次试验的判断基于独立听觉滤波器输出处dB水平的加权和。然而,心理测量数据在两个方面使模型的解释变得复杂:首先,它们表明,根据被试者和条件的不同,权重要么反映掩蔽声声成分在每次试验中的固定影响,要么反映偶尔将掩蔽声声成分误判为信号的影响。其次,它们表明,在任何一种情况下,从PF斜率估计的潜在决策变量的方差本身不足以解释观察到的信息掩蔽变化。