Suppr超能文献

青光眼视野的可靠性与可重复性的关联

Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field.

作者信息

McMillan T A, Stewart W C, Hunt H H

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992 Oct;70(5):665-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02150.x.

Abstract

We studied 207 glaucoma patients (207 eyes) who had two successive visual tests on the Humphrey Field Analyzer to determine the association of unreliability (> 10% incidence of a missed catch trial test) with threshold variation. We found that in patients where one visual field showed > 30% false negative or positive errors, and the other visual field also was unreliable, a significant increase in the variance of the mean defect existed from reliable patients (p < 0.05). Of patients who had only one of two visual fields which was unreliable (from false negative errors), only those with marked glaucomatous visual field loss (< -15 dB depth of defect) showed a greater variance in mean defect between examinations over reliable patients (p < 0.05). In total, 41 patients (19.8%) had unreliable visual fields associated with statistically increased threshold variation. This study suggests that patient reliability should be considered when interpreting changes in threshold between automated visual field examinations.

摘要

我们研究了207例青光眼患者(207只眼),这些患者在汉弗莱视野分析仪上进行了两次连续的视力测试,以确定不可靠性(漏检试验测试发生率>10%)与阈值变化之间的关联。我们发现,在一个视野显示>30%假阴性或阳性误差且另一个视野也不可靠的患者中,与可靠患者相比,平均缺损的方差显著增加(p<0.05)。在两个视野中只有一个不可靠(因假阴性误差)的患者中,只有那些有明显青光眼视野缺损(缺损深度<-15 dB)的患者,与可靠患者相比,检查之间平均缺损的方差更大(p<0.05)。总共有41例患者(19.8%)的视野不可靠,且阈值变化有统计学意义的增加。这项研究表明,在解释自动视野检查之间阈值的变化时,应考虑患者的可靠性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验