• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种检测系统(TDx、IMx和OPUS)测定地高辛浓度的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of digoxin concentrations determined by three assay systems: TDx, IMx and OPUS.

作者信息

Kagawa Yoshiyuki, Iwamoto Takuya, Matsuda Hiroaki, Mukohara Rika, Sawada Jun-ichi, Kojima Michio

机构信息

Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Mie University School of Medicine, Edobashi 2-174, Tsu-city, Mie 514-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2004 Jan;25(1):21-6. doi: 10.1002/bdd.382.

DOI:10.1002/bdd.382
PMID:14716749
Abstract

Digoxin concentrations measured by three automated immunoassay systems, i.e. OPUS, TDx and IMx assays, were compared in order to evaluate precision and accuracy performance, and data compatibility. Coefficients of variation for all methods in within-run and between-run precision were less than 10% at weighed-in concentrations of 0.545, 1.090 and 2.180 ng/ml. The accuracy relative to the three weighed-in concentrations ranged from 97% to 123% for all methods. One hundred and three plasma samples from 60 patients receiving digoxin were used to evaluate the data compatibility. Digoxin concentrations measured by the three immunoassay systems correlated well with one another. These results suggest that there are few problems when switching between digoxin assay methods, and that IMx and OPUS are more useful than TDx because they do not require sample pretreatment. The digoxin concentrations of the plasma samples from one patient receiving both digoxin and potassium canrenoate were investigated as a case report. The digoxin concentrations measured by TDx and IMx became higher than those measured by OPUS after starting the combination treatment. In another patient suffering from bilirubinaemia, the digoxin concentrations measured by TDx or IMx were higher than those measured by OPUS. These results suggest that OPUS has a higher specificity for measuring the plasma digoxin concentrations compared with TDx or IMx.

摘要

比较了通过三种自动免疫分析系统(即OPUS、TDx和IMx分析)测量的地高辛浓度,以评估精密度、准确性和数据兼容性。在0.545、1.090和2.180 ng/ml的称重浓度下,所有方法的批内和批间精密度变异系数均小于10%。所有方法相对于三种称重浓度的准确度在97%至123%之间。使用来自60名接受地高辛治疗患者的103份血浆样本评估数据兼容性。通过三种免疫分析系统测量的地高辛浓度之间相关性良好。这些结果表明,在地高辛分析方法之间切换时问题较少,并且IMx和OPUS比TDx更有用,因为它们不需要样本预处理。作为病例报告,研究了一名同时接受地高辛和坎利酸钾治疗患者的血浆样本中的地高辛浓度。联合治疗开始后,TDx和IMx测量的地高辛浓度高于OPUS测量的浓度。在另一名患有胆红素血症的患者中,TDx或IMx测量的地高辛浓度高于OPUS测量的浓度。这些结果表明,与TDx或IMx相比,OPUS在测量血浆地高辛浓度方面具有更高的特异性。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of digoxin concentrations determined by three assay systems: TDx, IMx and OPUS.三种检测系统(TDx、IMx和OPUS)测定地高辛浓度的比较评估。
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2004 Jan;25(1):21-6. doi: 10.1002/bdd.382.
2
Cross-reactivity of TDX and OPUS immunoassay systems for serum digoxin determination.
Ther Drug Monit. 1997 Dec;19(6):657-62. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199712000-00009.
3
Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations in renal transplant recipients using ACMIA and mFPIA methods.使用ACMIA法和mFPIA法对肾移植受者环孢素浓度的比较。
Clin Biochem. 2004 Nov;37(11):1016-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.07.004.
4
Abbott ARCHITECT clinical chemistry and immunoassay systems: digoxin assays are free of interferences from spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common metabolite canrenone.雅培 ARCHITECT 临床化学和免疫分析系统:地高辛检测不受螺内酯、坎利酮及其常见代谢产物坎利酮的干扰。
Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Feb;33(1):128-31. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181fd4c30.
5
Effect of spironolactone, potassium canrenoate and their common metabolite canrenone on serum digoxin measurement by digoxin III, a new digoxin immunoassay.螺内酯、坎利酸钾及其共同代谢产物坎利酮对采用新型地高辛免疫分析法地高辛III测定血清地高辛的影响。
Ther Drug Monit. 2008 Dec;30(6):744-7. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31818b0e6a.
6
Evaluation and comparison of the TDxII, Stratus, and OPUS digoxin assays.TDxII、Stratus和OPUS地高辛检测方法的评估与比较。
Ther Drug Monit. 1995 Feb;17(1):68-74. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199502000-00011.
7
Predictive performance study of two digoxin assays in subjects with various degrees of renal function.两种地高辛检测方法在不同肾功能程度受试者中的预测性能研究。
Ther Drug Monit. 2000 Dec;22(6):729-36. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200012000-00013.
8
False-positive serum digoxin concentrations determined by three digoxin assays in patients with liver disease.肝病患者中通过三种地高辛测定法测得的血清地高辛浓度假阳性结果
Clin Pharm. 1988 Jun;7(6):444-9.
9
Clinical repercussions of analytical interferences due to aldosterone antagonists in digoxin immunoassays: an assessment.醛固酮拮抗剂对地高辛免疫检测分析干扰的临床影响评估。
Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Apr;32(2):169-76. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181cdc93e.
10
Effect of Chinese medicines Chan Su and Lu-Shen-Wan on serum digoxin measurement by Digoxin III, a new digoxin immunoassay.中药蟾酥和六神丸对采用新型地高辛免疫分析法Digoxin III测定血清地高辛的影响。
Ther Drug Monit. 2008 Feb;30(1):95-9. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31816457c7.