Suppr超能文献

外科手术试验

Trials in surgery.

作者信息

Lilford R, Braunholtz D, Harris J, Gill T

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):6-16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4418.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trials in surgery pose some special problems. This paper examines these with reference to 10 years of methodological research sponsored by the UK National Health Service Research and Development programme.

METHODS

Solutions to common problems encountered in surgical studies were considered, such as issues of blinding, dependence of results on technical skill and continued evolution of technology.

RESULTS

Numerous methodological developments are described, including the tracker trial concept in which trial design can be adapted to take account of technical developments and interim results. The governance of trials, solutions to ethical conundra and the rising importance of databases are also discussed.

CONCLUSION

Like surgery itself, the methodological toolkit for evaluation of surgical procedures continues to evolve. The rules of statistical and scientific probity provide plenty of scope for imaginative design solutions for surgical trials.

摘要

背景

外科手术试验存在一些特殊问题。本文参考英国国家医疗服务体系研发计划资助的为期10年的方法学研究,对这些问题进行了探讨。

方法

考虑了外科研究中常见问题的解决方案,例如盲法问题、结果对技术技能的依赖性以及技术的持续发展。

结果

描述了众多方法学进展,包括追踪试验概念,即试验设计可进行调整以考虑技术发展和中期结果。还讨论了试验的管理、伦理难题的解决方案以及数据库日益重要的地位。

结论

与外科手术本身一样,用于评估外科手术程序的方法学工具包也在不断发展。统计和科学诚信规则为外科试验的创新设计解决方案提供了广阔空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验