Grant B F
Division of Biometry and Epidemiology, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992 Dec;16(6):1068-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb00701.x.
The purpose of the present study was to compare DSM-III-R and the proposed DSM-IV (options 1 and 2) diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence in a representative sample of the United States general population. Alcohol abuse and dependence diagnostic categories were contrasted in terms of prevalence and overlap. The prevalences of DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses of alcohol abuse and dependence combined were remarkably similar. However, disaggregation of abuse and dependence diagnoses showed that there were major discrepancies between the classification systems. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed in terms of differences in the number of diagnostic criteria and the content of the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV abuse and dependence categories, the requirement for physiological dependence in DSM-IV classifications, the relationship between the abuse and dependence categories, and the impact of the duration criteria.
本研究的目的是在美国普通人群的代表性样本中,比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和拟议的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(选项1和2)中酒精滥用和酒精依赖的诊断标准。从患病率和重叠情况方面对比了酒精滥用和酒精依赖的诊断类别。DSM-III-R和DSM-IV中酒精滥用和酒精依赖合并诊断的患病率非常相似。然而,对滥用和依赖诊断的细分表明,分类系统之间存在重大差异。从诊断标准数量的差异、DSM-III-R和DSM-IV中滥用和依赖类别的内容、DSM-IV分类中对生理依赖的要求、滥用和依赖类别之间的关系以及病程标准的影响等方面讨论了这些差异的原因。