Pirouzian Amir, Thornton Jennifer A, Ngo Sieu
Department of Ophthalmology and the Clinical Investigation Facility, David Grant US Air Force Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, CA, USA.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;122(1):11-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.1.11.
To compare laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in different eyes of the same subjects for subjective pain level, visual acuity, and corneal epithelial healing.
Prospective, randomized, double-masked study.
David Grant US Air Force Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Calif.
A convenience sample of 30 active-duty military members with mild to moderate myopia.
All patients had LASEK performed in one eye and PRK performed in the contralateral eye; the order of surgical procedures (ie, right eye first or left eye first) and the choice of procedures (ie, PRK in the right eye and LASEK in the left eye or LASEK in the right eye and PRK in the left eye) were determined in advance using a block randomization table.
The primary outcome measures were subjective pain level and the rate of corneal epithelial defect recovery. Postoperatively, subjects were evaluated for their subjective pain level, visual acuity, and corneal healing (ie, epithelial defect size) during the first week and up to 30 days after undergoing the surgical procedures.
There were no significant differences in subjective pain levels between the LASEK- and PRK-treated eyes on postoperative days 1, 2, or 3 (P>.05) or in visual acuity on postoperative days 3, 7, or 30 (P>.05). There was a statistically significant (P<.001) smaller median epithelial defect in the LASEK-treated group (1.0 mm(2)) compared with the PRK-treated group (16.0 mm(2)) on postoperative day 1. However, by postoperative day 3, the PRK-treated group (0.0 mm(2)) showed significantly (P<.001) smaller epithelial defects compared with the LASEK-treated group (4.0 mm(2)). By postoperative day 7, epithelial defects were undetectable in any subjects in either group.
Laser subepithelial keratomileusis and PRK have similar postoperative pain thresholds and visual acuity recordings. However, the epithelial healing pattern for LASEK and PRK differs. No additional clinical benefit is seen from the LASEK procedure relative to the PRK procedure.
在同一受试者的不同眼睛上比较准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)和准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)的主观疼痛程度、视力及角膜上皮愈合情况。
前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
加利福尼亚州特拉维斯空军基地的大卫·格兰特美国空军医疗中心。
30名患有轻至中度近视的现役军人的便利样本。
所有患者一只眼睛行LASEK,对侧眼睛行PRK;手术顺序(即右眼先做还是左眼先做)和术式选择(即右眼行PRK,左眼行LASEK或者右眼行LASEK,左眼行PRK)提前使用区组随机化表确定。
主要观察指标为主观疼痛程度和角膜上皮缺损恢复率。术后,在术后第一周及手术30天内对受试者的主观疼痛程度、视力和角膜愈合情况(即上皮缺损大小)进行评估。
LASEK和PRK治疗眼在术后第1、2或3天的主观疼痛程度(P>0.05)以及术后第3、7或30天的视力(P>0.05)无显著差异。术后第1天,LASEK治疗组的中位上皮缺损(1.0平方毫米)与PRK治疗组(16.0平方毫米)相比有统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。然而,术后第3天,PRK治疗组(0.0平方毫米)的上皮缺损比LASEK治疗组(4.0平方毫米)显著更小(P<0.001)。术后第7天,两组所有受试者均未检测到上皮缺损。
准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术和准分子激光角膜切削术术后疼痛阈值和视力记录相似。然而,LASEK和PRK的上皮愈合模式不同。相对于PRK手术,LASEK手术未显示出额外的临床益处。