Autrata Rudolf, Rehurek Jaroslav
Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Apr;29(4):661-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01897-7.
To assess and compare the clinical results (efficacy, safety, stability, and postoperative pain or discomfort) of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of low to moderate myopia.
Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
A prospective comparative study was performed in 184 eyes of 92 patients who had surface excimer ablation for the correction of myopia. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) was -4.65 diopters (D) +/- 3.14 (SD) (range -1.75 to -7.50 D). In each patient, LASEK was performed in 1 eye and PRK in the fellow eye by the same surgeon. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Both procedures were performed with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser using the same parameters and nomogram. The postoperative pain level, visual recovery, complications (haze), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and refractive outcome were evaluated and compared. All eyes completed a 24-month follow-up.
The postoperative MSE was -0.18 +/- 0.53 D in the PRK eyes and -0.33 +/- 0.46 D in the LASEK eyes. At 1 week, the mean UCVA was 0.64 +/- 0.21 and 0.87 +/- 0.23, respectively. No LASEK eye lost a line of BSCVA. There were no statistically significant differences between PRK and LASEK eyes in the safety and efficacy indices at 2 years. The mean pain level was significantly lower on days 1 to 3 in the LASEK eyes (P <.05). The mean corneal haze level was lower in the LASEK eyes (0.21) than in the PRK eyes (0.43) (P <.05). Seventy-nine patients preferred LASEK to PRK.
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy provided significantly quicker visual recovery, eliminated post-PRK pain, and reduced the haze level in eyes with low to moderate myopia compared with conventional PRK. It provided good visual and refractive outcomes. There were no serious complications.
评估并比较准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)和传统准分子原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)矫正低度至中度近视的临床效果(疗效、安全性、稳定性及术后疼痛或不适)。
捷克共和国布尔诺马萨里克大学医院眼科。
对92例接受表面准分子激光消融术矫正近视的患者的184只眼进行前瞻性对照研究。术前平均球镜等效度数(MSE)为-4.65屈光度(D)±3.14(标准差)(范围-1.75至-7.50 D)。每位患者的一只眼行LASEK,另一只眼行PRK,由同一位外科医生操作。第一只接受治疗的眼及所采用的手术方法均随机确定。两种手术均使用Nidek EC-5000准分子激光,采用相同参数和列线图。评估并比较术后疼痛程度、视力恢复情况、并发症(角膜混浊)、未矫正视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BSCVA)及屈光结果。所有眼均完成24个月随访。
PRK组术后MSE为-0.18±0.53 D,LASEK组为-0.33±0.46 D。1周时,平均UCVA分别为0.64±0.21和0.87±0.23。LASEK组无眼BSCVA下降一行。2年时,PRK组和LASEK组在安全性和疗效指标方面无统计学显著差异。LASEK组术后第1至3天平均疼痛程度显著较低(P<.05)。LASEK组平均角膜混浊程度(0.21)低于PRK组(0.43)(P<.05)。79例患者更喜欢LASEK而非PRK。
与传统PRK相比,准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术能使视力恢复明显更快,消除PRK术后疼痛,并降低低度至中度近视眼中的角膜混浊程度。其视觉和屈光效果良好。无严重并发症。