Scholle Frank, Li Kui, Bodola Francis, Ikeda Masanori, Luxon Bruce A, Lemon Stanley M
Departments of Microbiology and Immunology. Human Biological Chemistry and Genetics. Program in Bioinformatics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1019.
J Virol. 2004 Feb;78(3):1513-24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.3.1513-1524.2004.
Considerable controversy surrounds the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) protein expression on viability of host cells and regulation of the cell cycle. Both promotion of cellular proliferation and apoptosis have been observed in different experimental systems. To determine whether expression of the entire complement of HCV proteins in the context of ongoing viral RNA replication significantly alters the host cell transcriptome and cell cycle regulatory processes, we carried out high-density oligonucleotide microarray studies and analyzed cell cycle distributions and S-phase entry in Huh7 cell clones harboring selectable, full-length, replicating HCV RNAs that express the entire genotype 1b, HCV-N polyprotein, and clonally related cells in which all viral RNA was eliminated by prior treatment with alpha interferon. Oligonucleotide microarray analyses revealed only subtle, coordinated differences in the mRNA profiles of cells containing replicating viral RNA and their interferon-cured progeny, with variation between different cell clones having a greater influence on the cellular transcriptome than the presence or absence of replicating HCV RNA. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated no significant differences in cell cycle distribution among populations of asynchronously growing cells of both types. Cell lines containing replicating viral RNA and their interferon-cured progeny were able to reenter the cell cycle similarly after transient G(1) arrest. In contrast, although viral protein expression and genome replication did not alter cell cycle control in these cells, HCV genome replication was highly dependent on cellular proliferation, with viral RNA synthesis strongly decreased in poorly proliferating, confluent, or serum-starved cells and substantially enhanced in the S phase of the cell cycle.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)蛋白表达对宿主细胞活力及细胞周期调控的影响存在相当大的争议。在不同的实验系统中,既观察到了细胞增殖的促进,也观察到了细胞凋亡。为了确定在持续的病毒RNA复制情况下,HCV蛋白的完整互补体表达是否会显著改变宿主细胞转录组和细胞周期调控过程,我们进行了高密度寡核苷酸微阵列研究,并分析了携带可选择的、全长的、复制性HCV RNA(表达完整的1b基因型HCV-N多蛋白)的Huh7细胞克隆以及通过先前用α干扰素处理消除了所有病毒RNA的克隆相关细胞中的细胞周期分布和S期进入情况。寡核苷酸微阵列分析显示,含有复制性病毒RNA的细胞及其经干扰素治疗后的后代的mRNA谱仅存在细微的、协同的差异,不同细胞克隆之间的差异对细胞转录组的影响大于复制性HCV RNA的存在与否。流式细胞术分析表明,这两种类型的异步生长细胞群体的细胞周期分布没有显著差异。含有复制性病毒RNA的细胞系及其经干扰素治疗后的后代在短暂的G(1)期停滞后能够类似地重新进入细胞周期。相比之下,尽管病毒蛋白表达和基因组复制并未改变这些细胞中的细胞周期控制,但HCV基因组复制高度依赖于细胞增殖,在增殖不良、汇合或血清饥饿的细胞中病毒RNA合成强烈减少,而在细胞周期的S期则显著增强。